ArticleCureus2024
Effectiveness of Flow Diverter Stents in the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: Single-Center 10-Year Results.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Visual Support System for Stent-Assisted Treatment of Cerebral Aneurysms Using 3D Imaging and Augmented Reality.Neuroinformatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose This study's objective was to show how effectively flow-diverting stents work when treating cerebral aneurysms. The assessment aimed to determine efficaciousness related to aneurysm type, size, and location as well as early- and late-term results. Material and method The study included 153 aneurysms from 122 patients treated in interventional radiology unit with flow diverter stents between July 2010 and June 2020. Apart from demographic data, size, type, and location of aneurysms; technical success, peri, post-procedural, and late complications; aneurysm occlusion rates, morbidity and mortality rates were extracted from patient records. Results This study enrolled 90 (73.8%) females and 32 (26.2%) males; average age of the patients was 52.8±12.9. The average follow-up period was 33.4±9.9 months. The most common type of aneurysm was saccular (133; 86.9%), and the most common location was the supraclinoid segment with 67 (43.8%). Complete occlusion was observed in 115 of 140 aneurysms from 110 patients during follow-up. No statistically significant difference was detected between the sizes and types of aneurysms and complete occlusion rates (p=0.096, p=0.583). The total occlusion rate was found to be significantly higher in internal carotid artery (ICA) supraclinoid segment aneurysms compared to other locations (p = 0.006). During the follow-up period, flow diverter stent-related permanent morbidity was observed in four (3.6%) patients and mortality was observed in five (4.5%) patients. Conclusion Flow diverter stents can be successfully applied to many aneurysm types, from small aneurysms to large and giant aneurysms, and have high aneurysm occlusion rates with low morbidity and mortality. By the aspects of the current study the total occlusion rate was found to be significantly higher in ICA supraclinoid segment aneurysms compared to other localizations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.