Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39568448›Full record

ArticleHealth services insights2024

Implementing a Decommissioning Programme in Swedish Healthcare: Experiences of Healthcare Managers.

Inga-Britt Gustafsson, Lars Wallin, Ulrika Winblad, Mio Fredriksson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services insights, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Inga-Britt GustafssonDepartment of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Health Services Research, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5667-458X
Lars WallinCentre for Clinical Research, Dalarna, Sweden.
Ulrika WinbladDepartment of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Health Services Research, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Mio FredrikssonDepartment of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Health Services Research, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3858-3454

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decommissioning programmes pose a substantial risk of failure compared to other change processes in healthcare. A better understanding of the challenges associated with change processes initiated by resource scarcity faced by healthcare managers is crucial. This study describes and compares department and unit managers' experiences during the implementation of a large-scale decommissioning programme in a Swedish region. A survey was developed and a cross-sectional study was performed, measuring 172 healthcare managers' experiences of (1) the region's leadership, (2) their own participation and (3) their own commitment and responsibility during the implementation of the decommissioning programme. Respondents were 50 department managers and 122 unit managers (93% and 58% response rate, respectively). There was a significant difference between department and unit managers in their experiences of the region's leadership and their own participation in the decommissioning programme. Unit managers were more dissatisfied with the way it developed compared to department managers. For example, unit managers reported a lower level of leadership support, incentives to participate, and that their knowledge and skills were not fully utilised. Involvement of unit managers in a more fruitful way might enhance the results of decommissioning programmes. This study highlights a key actor in this context: the unit manager.

Indexed as

Decommissioningdepartment managerhealthcarelarge budget deficitsunit manager

Identifiers

PMID39568448
PMCPMC11577462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.