ArticleHaematologica2025
Investigating the influence of germline
Article in Haematologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Zanubrutinib in B-cell lymphomas: from clinical pharmacology to therapeutic application.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients have an increased risk of secondary cancers, along with predisposition to CLL in their relatives. We have previously identified germline ATM variants as associated with CLL risk. Here, we present their impact on predisposition to secondary neoplasms in CLL patients and their relatives. Patients enrolled in our tissue bank who had germline ATM status available were mailed a questionnaire between April 2022 and May 2023. Of the 333 patients who replied to the questionnaire, 283 patients (85%) reported at least one relative with a cancer history. The prevalence of family history of B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders was significantly higher (P=0.02) in patients with germline ATM variants (32%) compared to those without germline ATM variants (21%) including familial CLL (25% vs. 18%) (P=0.04). No significant difference in the prevalence of secondary cancers was found between patients with and without germline ATM variants (P=0.73), although the role for individual ATM variants in other malignancies could not be excluded given the small sample size. Time to first CLL treatment (TTFT) was shorter in patients harboring somatic ATM events while no difference was observed in patients with germline ATM variants. In conclusion, we demonstrate a higher prevalence of B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders, including familial CLL, in relatives of CLL patients carrying germline ATM variants. The presence of these germline variants did not impact TTFT compared to patients harboring somatic ATM mutations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.