Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39568299›Full record

ArticleEquine veterinary journal2025

Evaluation of digital radiographic measurements for the diagnosis of acute laminitis.

Georgia Skelton, Elizabeth Acutt, Darko Stefanovski, Andrew van Eps

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Equine veterinary journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Georgia SkeltonDepartment of Clinical Studies-New Bolton Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Kennett Square, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2121-8666
Elizabeth AcuttDepartment of Clinical Studies-New Bolton Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Kennett Square, Pennsylvania, USA.
Darko StefanovskiDepartment of Clinical Studies-New Bolton Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Kennett Square, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4654-0569
Andrew van EpsDepartment of Clinical Studies-New Bolton Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Kennett Square, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6108-2503

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraditional radiographic measurements of distal phalanx (Pd) displacement based on the outer hoof wall are not useful for diagnosis of acute laminitis.

objectivesWe hypothesised that the distance between the inner hoof wall and Pd ('lamellar lucent zone'; LLZ) measured on lateromedial digital radiographs would be increased in horses with acute and subacute laminitis compared with healthy horses. STUDY

designRetrospective cohort study and in vivo experimental study.

methodsForelimb radiographs from 32 healthy and 18 laminitic mixed-breed horses were analysed retrospectively. Laminitis was defined by at least two clinical signs (acute multi-limb lameness, increased digital pulse amplitude and/or persistently warm hooves) for ≤3 days (acute), or >3 and ≤14 days (subacute) duration, without overt palmar rotation (≥3°), remodelling, or distal displacement of the Pd. Some laminitic limbs initially classified as acute were subsequently radiographed later in hospitalisation and also included as subacute. Twelve measurements including LLZ at proximal, middle, and distal locations were performed on 126 forelimb radiographs that met the criteria for acute laminitis (n = 39), subacute laminitis (n = 23) or healthy control (n = 64). A mixed effects linear regression model was used for comparisons and a receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve was created for select measurements. Three horses were serially radiographed to study the impact of magnification and obliquity.

resultsThe mean [95% confidence interval] LLZ (mm) was increased in acute and subacute laminitis compared with control in the proximal (acute = 8.8 [8.4-9.2]; subacute = 9 [8-9.9]; control = 7.3 [7-7.7]), middle (acute = 8.9 [8.5-9.3]; subacute = 9.1 [8.2-10]; control = 6.9 [6.5-7.2]), and distal (acute = 9.1 [8.5-9.7]; subacute = 10.2 [9.1-11.3]; control = 7.5 [7.2-7.8]) dorsal lamellar regions (p < 0.001). At a cut-off of >7.5 mm for middle LLZ, sensitivity was 87% [73%-94%] and specificity 91% [81%-96%] for diagnosis of acute laminitis. Using the ratio of middle LLZ to distal phalanx cortical length, sensitivity was 95% [81%-99%] and specificity was 95% [87%-99%] (cut-off >0.11). Magnification and obliquity affected absolute LLZ measurements but did not alter LLZ ratios. MAIN LIMITATIONS: No histological confirmation of laminitis.

conclusionsLLZ measurements are potentially useful for radiographic diagnosis of acute and subacute laminitis.

Indexed as

Foot DiseasesHoof and ClawHorse DiseasesInflammationRadiographyAcute DiseaseAnimalsFemaleForelimbHorsesLameness, AnimalMaleRetrospective Studiesequinehorselamellarlucentradiographyzone

Identifiers

PMID39568299
PMCPMC12135759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.