Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39568153›Full record

ArticleThe New phytologist2025

A nuclear phylogenomic tree of grasses (Poaceae) recovers current classification despite gene tree incongruence.

Grass Phylogeny Working Group III

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The New phytologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. A phylogeny ofPhytoKeys · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Phylogeny ofPhytoKeys · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Integrated review ofMolecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Reticulation withinPhytoKeys · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Grass Phylogeny Working Group III

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-10-LABX-0041Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-10-LABX-25-01Agricultural Research ServiceAustralian Biological Resources StudyBioplatforms Australia (enabled by NCRIS)Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/S019669/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/X019683/1Calleva FoundationCanadian Museum of NatureCentre for Australian National Biodiversity ResearchConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 315433/2023-0Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 426334/2018-3Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 441760/2020-1Council of Heads of Australasian HerbariaCSIRODepartment of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Western AustraliaFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais APQ-01222-21Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais APQ-03365-21Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais BPD-00736-22Georgia Research AllianceH2020 European Research Council ERC-2014-STG-638333HORIZON EUROPE 101105838Ian Potter FoundationKunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of SciencesNational Natural Science Foundation of China 31670196National Natural Science Foundation of China 32120103003National Natural Science Foundation of China 32270227Natural Environment Research Council NE/T011025/1Royal Botanical Gardens, KewRoyal Botanic Gardens and Domain TrustRoyal Botanic Gardens Foundation (Victoria)Royal Botanic Gardens, VictoriaRoyal Society RGF\EA\181050Spanish Aragon Government LMP82_21Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation PID2022-140074NB-I00Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation TED2021-131073B-I00University of MissouriUS National Science Foundation 1501406US National Science Foundation DEB 0920147US National Science Foundation DEB-1929514US National Science Foundation IOS-1822330
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Grasses (Poaceae) comprise c. 11 800 species and are central to human livelihoods and terrestrial ecosystems. Knowing their relationships and evolutionary history is key to comparative research and crop breeding. Advances in genome-scale sequencing allow for increased breadth and depth of phylogenomic analyses, making it possible to infer a new reference species tree of the family. We inferred a comprehensive species tree of grasses by combining new and published sequences for 331 nuclear genes from genome, transcriptome, target enrichment and shotgun data. Our 1153-tip tree covers 79% of grass genera (including 21 genera sequenced for the first time) and all but two small tribes. We compared it to a newly inferred 910-tip plastome tree. We recovered most of the tribes and subfamilies previously established, despite pervasive incongruence among nuclear gene trees. The early diversification of the PACMAD clade could represent a hard polytomy. Gene tree-species tree reconciliation suggests that reticulation events occurred repeatedly. Nuclear-plastome incongruence is rare, with very few cases of supported conflict. We provide a robust framework for the grass tree of life to support research on grass evolution, including modes of reticulation, and genetic diversity for sustainable agriculture.

Indexed as

Cell NucleusGenes, PlantPhylogenyPoaceaeGenome, PlantGenomicsAngiosperms353genomeincongruencephylogenomicsplastomePoaceaetarget capturetranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID39568153
PMCPMC11655423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.