Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39568111›Full record

ArticleThe New phytologist2025

Herbicidal interference: glyphosate drives both the ecology and evolution of plant-herbivore interactions.

Grace M Zhang, Regina S Baucom

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The New phytologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Grace M ZhangDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, 4034 Biological Sciences Building, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7665-9587
Regina S BaucomDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, 4034 Biological Sciences Building, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7960-498X

Funding

University of Michigan
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The coevolution of plants and their insect herbivores reflects eco-evolutionary dynamics at work - ecological interactions influence adaptive traits, which feed back to shape the broader ecological community. However, novel anthropogenic stressors like herbicide, which are strong selective agents, can disrupt these dynamics. Little is known about how the evolution of herbicide resistance may impact plant-herbivore interactions. We performed a common garden field experiment using Ipomoea purpurea (common morning glory) and the herbicide glyphosate (Roundup) to investigate the ecological effects of herbicide exposure on insect herbivory patterns and assess the potential evolutionary consequences. We find that plants treated with glyphosate experienced higher levels of herbivory and altered chewing herbivory damage patterns. Additionally, we found that glyphosate resistance is positively associated with herbivory resistance, and uncovered positive selection for increased glyphosate resistance, suggesting that selection for increased glyphosate resistance has the potential to lead to increased herbivory resistance. Positive selection for glyphosate resistance, coupled with the detection of genetic variation for this trait, suggests there is potential for glyphosate resistance - and herbivory resistance via hitchhiking - to further evolve. Our results show that herbicides cannot just influence, but potentially drive the eco-evolutionary dynamics of plant-herbivore interactions.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionGlycineGlyphosateHerbicide ResistanceHerbicidesHerbivoryAnimalsEcologyInsectaIpomoeaSelection, GeneticGlycineGlyphosateHerbicideseco‐evolutionary dynamicsglyphosateherbicide resistanceherbivory resistanceIpomoea purpureaplant–herbivore interactions

Identifiers

PMID39568111
PMCPMC11655431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.