ArticleNeuropsychopharmacology reports2025
Initial psychotropic prescriptions and symptom associations in first-visit patients with major depressive disorder: A single-center cross-sectional study.
Article in Neuropsychopharmacology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Initial psychotropic prescriptions and symptom associations in first-visit patients with major depressive disorder: A single-center cross-sectional study.Neuropsychopharmacology reports · 2025Article
- Predictors of Changes in Depressive Symptoms with Major Depressive Disorder - A Naturalistic 6-month Follow-up Study.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimThere are limited reports regarding psychotropic prescriptions in first-visit patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). The objective of this study is to clarify the prescription patterns of psychotropics and their association with symptoms among first-visit patients with MDD in Japan.
methodsIn this cross-sectional analysis, we examined 376 first-visit patients diagnosed with MDD. Depressive symptoms were evaluated using the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Japanese version (QIDS-J). To assess personality traits, we administered the Japanese version of the Ten Item Personality Inventory (TIPI-J), and psychotic symptoms were evaluated using the PRIME Screen-Revised (PS-J).
resultsAmong the first-visit patients with MDD, 31.4% (118/376) were prescribed antidepressants, and 18.1% (68/376) received benzodiazepines. Overall, 40.2% (151/376) of the patients were prescribed at least one psychotropic medication. In a multivariate logistic regression model using the forced entry method, missing data on educational attainment and the view of myself domain of the QIDS-J were negatively associated, while the concentration/decision-making domain of the QIDS-J was positively associated with antidepressant prescription.
conclusionMore than half of the first-visit patients did not receive any psychotropic medication. Psychiatrists appear to consider specific symptoms and personality traits when deciding whether to prescribe medications, which may also be influenced by patient preferences. Further studies, including longitudinal analyses, are needed to explore these associations in more detail.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.