ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2024
Can the clinical sign "head-turning sign" and simple questions in "Neucop-Q" predict amyloid β pathology?
Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The head turning sign "outside the clinic walls" in patients with mild cognitive impairment and dementia.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2026Article
- Plasma biomarkers for early detection of alzheimer's disease: a cross-sectional study in a Japanese cohort.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2025Article
- Limited utility of imaging-based (N) markers in predicting cerebral spinal fluid Alzheimer's disease biomarker positivity in lecanemab-eligible mild cognitive impairment.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Distinct brain volume changes associated with the head-turning sign and Neucop-Q response patterns in Alzheimer's disease.Journal of Alzheimer's disease reportsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo establish simple screening tests to suspect Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology, the clinical sign "head-turning sign" (HTS), which is a patient's behavior of turning their head towards their partner to seek assistance with questions posed by the examiner during the interview, and the simple screening questionnaire for dementia named "Neucop-Q" were validated in participants diagnosed with amyloid and tau positron emission tomography (PET).
methodsWe enrolled 155 patients: 47 cognitive normal, 36 with mild cognitive impairment, 64 with dementia, and 8 with psychiatric disorders. All participants underwent Neucop-Q [three questions: Consciousness/self-awareness of cognitive disabilities (C) normal/impaired (nor/imp), Pleasure/pastime (P) nor/imp, and News/knowledge on current topics (N) nor/imp] and amyloid/tau PET. Additionally, we measured plasma amyloid β (Aβ) 42/40 ratio, phosphorylated tau 181 (pTau181), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and neurofilament light (NFL) levels and compared with HTS and Neucop-Q results.
resultsThe specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) of HTS positivity (HTSpos) were the highest (amyloid PET: 0.930 and 0.870, tau PET: 0.944 and 0.957, respectively), while Cimp and Nimp had a high negative predictive value (NPV) for amyloid PET (negativity) (0.750 and 0.725). Pimp showed high specificity for predicting non-AD tau positivity among non-AD participants without amyloid PET positivity (0.854). To validate these findings with PET results, we examined the correlation between well-established AD blood biomarkers and results obtained from these screening tests. HTSpos, Cimp, and Nimp were strongly associated with Aβ42/40 ratio (P < 0.0001, P = 0.0022, and P = 0.001), pTau181 (P < 0.0001, P = 0.0095, and P = 0.001), GFAP (P = 0.0372, P = 0.0088, and P = 0.0002), and amyloid PET Centiloid (P < 0.0001, P = 0.0210, and P = 0.0006), whereas Pimp increased neuroinflammation (GFAP; P = 0.0061) and was associated with non-AD tauopathy. The combination of Neucop-Q questions showed that Cimp/Pnor/Nimp subjects have the highest specificity and PPV (0.972 and 0.833) and were strongly associated with Aβ42/40 ratio (P = 0.0006), pTau181 (P = 0.0006), and amyloid PET Centiloid (P < 0.0001).
conclusionHTSpos, Cimp, and Nimp have diagnostic utility in suspecting MCI due to AD and AD, and Pimp has diagnostic value in non-AD tauopathy. HTSpos, Cimp, and Nimp were associated with biomarkers of Aβ pathology. HTS and Neucop-Q may serve as powerful first-line screening in memory clinics.
trial registrationUMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR) under registration numbers 000032027 (Registration date: 2018/03/31) and 000030248 (Registration date: 2018/01/01).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.