Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39568060›Full record

ArticleBMC chemistry2024

Simultaneously quantifying a novel five-component anti- migraine formulation containing ergotamine, propyphenazone, caffeine, camylofin, and mecloxamine using UV spectrophotometry and chemometric models.

Ahmed Emad F Abbas, Nahla A Abdelshafi, Mohammed Gamal, Michael K Halim, Basmat Amal M Said, Ibrahim A Naguib, Mohmeed M A Mansour, Samir Morshedy, Yomna A Salem

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ahmed Emad F AbbasFaculty of Pharmacy, Analytical Chemistry Department, October 6 University, 6 October City, 12585, Giza, Egypt. dr.ahmedeemad@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7098-8662
Nahla A AbdelshafiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Analytical Chemistry, School of Pharmacy, Badr University in Cairo, Badr City, 11829, Cairo, Egypt.
Mohammed GamalPharmaceutical Analytical Chemistry Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Beni-Suef University, Alshaheed Shehata Ahmad Hegazy St, Beni-Suef, Egypt.
Michael K HalimFaculty of Pharmacy, Analytical Chemistry Department, October 6 University, 6 October City, 12585, Giza, Egypt.
Basmat Amal M SaidCollege of Pharmacy, Al-Mustaqbal University, Babylon, 51001, Iraq.
Ibrahim A NaguibDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
Mohmeed M A MansourChemistry Department, Faculty of Science, University of Al-Jufra, P.O. Box 61602, Al-Jufra, Libya.
Samir MorshedyPharmaceutical Analytical Chemistry Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Damanhour University, Damanhour, Egypt.
Yomna A SalemDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Sinai University -Kantara Branch, Ismailia, 341636, Egypt.

Funding

Taif University TU-DSPP-2024-49
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study presents a new method for simultaneously quantifying a complex anti-migraine formulation containing five components (ergotamine, propyphenazone, caffeine, camylofin, and mecloxamine) using UV spectrophotometry and chemometric models. The formulation presents analytical challenges due to the wide variation in component concentrations (ERG: PRO: CAF: CAM: MEC ratio of 0.075:20:8:5:4) and highly overlapping UV spectra. To create a comprehensive validation dataset, the Kennard-Stone Clustering Algorithm was used to address the limitations of arbitrary data partitioning in chemometric methods. Three different chemometric models were evaluated: Classical Least Squares (CLS), Partial Least Squares (PLS), and Multivariate Curve Resolution-Alternating Least Squares (MCR-ALS). Among these, MCR-ALS demonstrated excellent performance, achieving recovery values of 98-102% for all components, accompanied by minimal root mean square errors of calibration (0.072-0.378) and prediction (0.077-0.404). Moreover, the model exhibited high accuracy, with relative errors ranging from 1.936 to 3.121%, bias-corrected mean square errors between 0.074 and 0.389, and a good sensitivity (0.2097-1.2898 μg mL

Indexed as

Chemometric modelsKennard stone clustering algorithmMulti-component pharmaceutical analysisSustainability assessmentUV Spectrophotometry

Identifiers

PMID39568060
PMCPMC11580349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.