ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2024
Timing matters: diurnal spine length variation in pediatric patients during radiotherapy.
Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Diurnal variation of the distance between cranium and the third lumbar vertebra and its implications for craniospinal irradiation.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDuring the day-night cycle, gravity and applied stress to the body mass and spine causes a decrease in body height, which is restored overnight. This diurnal spine length variation has not yet been quantified during radiotherapy. Therefore, we aimed to quantify diurnal spine length variation on cone beam CTs (CBCTs) of pediatric patients (< 18 years) who underwent radiotherapy.
methodsFor this retrospective study, we included 32 patients (mean age 10.0, range 2.7-16.1 years) who received image guided radiotherapy between 2012 and 2018 in two institutes. Patients were included when they had two fractions per day, or when fractions were scheduled on varying time slots over the course of treatment. Daily CBCTs were registered to the planning CTs using two automatic registrations relative to the bony anatomy; one to vertebra T11 and one to vertebra L4. For each CBCT, the differences between the cranial-caudal (CC) position of the T11 and L4 vertebrae were calculated. To determine the diurnal spine length variation, the difference in vertebrae position between the morning and afternoon CBCTs was calculated. Furthermore, we investigated the possible correlation of diurnal spine length variation with the time slot differences (time interval) between CBCTs (Spearman's ρ).
resultsOverall, the median spine length variation was -1.0 (range -3.9-0.1) mm, and we found a significant reduction in spine length over the day (p < 0.001) with substantial variations between patients. Time intervals between CBCTs ranging from 4.0 to 9.5 h were not correlated with spine length reduction (ρ=-0.01; p = 0.95).
conclusionsWe found a small but significant reduction in spine length (vertebrae T11 to L4) over the course of day in pediatric patients undergoing radiotherapy, measured on CBCT imaging. Spine length reduction did not correlate with CBCT time intervals. However, our results indicate that diurnal spine length reduction could induce a setup error during treatment, and therefore should be considered in pediatric radiotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.