ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2024
HKA-Net: clinically-adapted deep learning for automated measurement of hip-knee-ankle angle on lower limb radiography for knee osteoarthritis assessment.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current state of research and future developments of artificial intelligence in pain diagnosis and treatment.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Deep Learning-Based Full-Process Automatic CPAK Classification System and Its Application in the Analysis of Alignment Outcomes Before and After Knee Arthroplasty.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Enhancing automatic landmark localization in X-ray images using combined segmentation and regression models: application to lower limb alignment assessment.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAccurate measurement of the hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle is essential for informed clinical decision-making in the management of knee osteoarthritis (OA). Knee OA is commonly associated with varus deformity, where the alignment of the knee shifts medially, leading to increased stress and deterioration of the medial compartment. The HKA angle, which quantifies this alignment, is a critical indicator of the severity of varus deformity and helps guide treatment strategies, including corrective surgeries. Current manual methods are labor-intensive, time-consuming, and prone to inter-observer variability. Developing an automated model for HKA angle measurement is challenging due to the elaborate process of generating handcrafted anatomical landmarks, which is more labor-intensive than the actual measurement. This study aims to develop a ResNet-based deep learning model that predicts the HKA angle without requiring explicit anatomical landmark annotations and to assess its accuracy and efficiency compared to conventional manual methods.
methodsWe developed a deep learning model based on the variants of the ResNet architecture to process lower limb radiographs and predict HKA angles without explicit landmark annotations. The classification performance for the four stages of varus deformity (stage I: 0°-10°, stage II: 10°-20°, stage III: > 20°, others: genu valgum or normal alignment) was also evaluated. The model was trained and validated using a retrospective cohort of 300 knee OA patients (Kellgren-Lawrence grade 3 or higher), with horizontal flip augmentation applied to double the dataset to 600 samples, followed by fivefold cross-validation. An extended temporal validation was conducted on a separate cohort of 50 knee OA patients. The model's accuracy was assessed by calculating the mean absolute error between predicted and actual HKA angles. Additionally, the classification of varus deformity stages was conducted to evaluate the model's ability to provide clinically relevant categorizations. Time efficiency was compared between the automated model and manual measurements performed by an experienced orthopedic surgeon.
resultsThe ResNet-50 model achieved a bias of - 0.025° with a standard deviation of 1.422° in the retrospective cohort and a bias of - 0.008° with a standard deviation of 1.677° in the temporal validation cohort. Using the ResNet-152 model, it accurately classified the four stages of varus deformity with weighted F1-score of 0.878 and 0.859 in the retrospective and temporal validation cohorts, respectively. The automated model was 126.7 times faster than manual measurements, reducing the total time from 49.8 min to 23.6 sec for the temporal validation cohort.
conclusionsThe proposed ResNet-based model provides an efficient and accurate method for measuring HKA angles and classifying varus deformity stages without the need for extensive landmark annotations. Its high accuracy and significant improvement in time efficiency make it a valuable tool for clinical practice, potentially enhancing decision-making and workflow efficiency in the management of knee OA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.