ArticleVirology journal2024
Immune evasion after SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.5 and XBB.1.9 endemic observed from Guangdong Province, China from 2022 to 2023.
Article in Virology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFrom 2022 to 2023, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) caused by Omicron variants spread rapidly in Guangdong Province, resulting in over 80% of the population being infected.
resultsTo investigate the levels of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) in individuals following the rapid pandemic and to evaluate the cross-protection against currently circulating variants of SARS-CoV-2 in China, neutralization assay and magnetic particle chemiluminescence method were used to test the 117 serum samples from individuals who had recovered 4 weeks post-infection. The results indicated that the levels of NAbs against prototype and Omicron variants BA.5 were significantly higher than those against Omicron variants BQ.1, XBB.1.1, XBB.1.9, XBB.1.16 and EG.5, regardless of whether the infection was primary or secondary.
conclusionsThe cross-protection provided by NAbs induced by prototype and Omicron BA.5 variants was limited when challenged by BQ.1, XBB.1.1, XBB.1.9, XBB.1.16 and EG.5 variants. This indicates that we should pay more attention to the risk of multiple infection from any novel Omicron variants that may emerge in the near future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.