ArticleStem cell research & therapy2024
Safety and efficacy of human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stromal cells in fetal ovine myelomeningocele repair.
Article in Stem cell research & therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advances in Fetal Repair of Spina Bifida Integrating Prenatal Surgery, Stem Cells, and Biomaterials.Biomedicines · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stromal cells (hUC-MSCs) patch used as an adjuvant therapy in fetal myelomeningocele (MMC) surgery in the ovine model.
methodshUC-MSCs were isolated from human umbilical cords (UC) using the explant method, cultured and characterized. hUC-MSCs were then embedded in a fibrin patch. MMC were surgically created at 75 days of gestation and repaired at 89 days of gestation in sheep fetuses. Two groups were compared: the hUC-MSCs group in which MMC was repaired using a cellular patch and the control group, in which MMC was repaired using an acellular patch. Safety was evaluated by clinical ewes' monitoring during gestation, and clinical and histological examinations of lambs after birth. Efficacy was assessed by clinical neurological evaluation at 2 and 24 h of life using the sheep locomotor rating scale and by histological analyses.
resultsAmong the 17 operated lambs, nine were born alive: six in the hUC-MSCs group and three in the control group. Overall fetal loss was 47% (8/17) without differences between the two groups. No fever was reported in ewes. No tumors were detected in clinical and histological examinations in the lambs. At 24 h of life, mean Sheep Locomotor Rating score was higher in the hUC-MSCs group than in the control group: 15.0 versus 2.0 (p = 0.07). Histological analyses showed a higher large neurons density in the hUC-MSCs group in comparison with the control group: 9.9 versus 6.3/mm
conclusionsOvine fetal repair of MMC using human UC-MSCs seems to be an effective and safe procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.