ArticleBMC women's health2024
Efficacy and safety of Le Fort colpocleisis in the treatment of stage III-IV pelvic organ prolapse.
Article in BMC women's health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analysis of Clinical Characteristics of Partial Versus Total Colpocleisis for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Multicenter Retrospective Study in China.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
- Comparison of Colpocleisis and Long-Term Pessary Therapy in the Management of Severe Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Retrospective Observational Study.Gynecologic and obstetric investigation · 2026Article
- Multiparametric Pelvic-Floor Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Staging of Anterior-Compartment Clinical Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Prospective Study.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Pyometra-An Atypical Complication Following LeFort Colpocleisis: Narrative Review.International urogynecology journal · 2026Review
- The Efficacy and Safety of Colpocleisis for Urinary Retention in Elderly Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse.Cureus · 2025Article
- From Mesh to Modern Therapies: An Updated Narrative Review on Urogenital Prolapse.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Colpocleisis-Still a Valuable Option: A Point of Technique.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLe Fort colpocleisis is an obliterative surgery for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). In this study, we aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of Le Fort colpocleisis in the treatment of patients with stage III-IV POP.
methodsThe study was designed as a retrospective analysis of a single-center case series. Patients with stage III-IV POP treated with Le Fort colpocleisis were included. Perioperative indicators, subjective and objective outcomes and complications were assessed. The POP-Quantification (POP-Q) system was used for objective outcome evaluation. Pelvic Floor Distress Questionnaire (PFDI-20) and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) were used for subjective outcome evaluation.
resultsA total of 54 patients with complete pre- and postoperative data completed follow-up and were included in our study. The mean ± standard deviation of operative time, intraoperative blood loss, recovery activity time, postoperative hospitalization time and total hospitalization time were 146.85 ± 37.01 min, 92.04 ± 68.31 ml, 2.81 ± 0.85 days, 6.5 ± 2.11 days and 13.52 ± 4.78 days, respectively. Within the median follow-up period of 38.5 months, the objective cure rate of Le Fort colpocleisis reached 98.15% (53/54), and the subjective cure rate reached 92.59% (50/54). No serious complications were reported during the perioperative period and follow-up period.
conclusionLe Fort colpocleisis is an effective and safe procedure for the treatment of severe POP. Because of its lower operative risk, better subjective and objective outcomes, lower rates of prolapse recurrence and perioperative complications, Le Fort colpocleisis should be considered as the recommended procedure for elderly patients with severe POP (stage III-IV).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.