ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2024
Tailored bi-atrial linear ablation guided by electrophysiological mapping for persistent atrial fibrillation.
Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06952023 (Pulsed Field-Based Bi-atrial Maze-like Catheter Ablation Versus Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Pulsed Field-Based Bi-atrial Maze-like Catheter Ablation Versus Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: A Multi-center Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo explore the safety and efficacy of a novel strategy (bi-atrial linear catheter ablation guided by electrophysiological mapping) for persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF) treatment.
methods83 patients with PeAF were enrolled for evaluation of ablation strategy. 43 patients were subjected to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) strategy (PVI group). 40 patients were subjected to bi-atrial linear ablation strategy guided by electrophysiological mapping (PVI, left atrial BOX ablation, coronary sinus endocardial linear ablation, tailored left atrial anterior wall linear ablation, mitral isthmus linear ablation with necessary ethanol infusion into the vein of Marshall, right atrial posterior wall linear ablation and cavo-tricuspid isthmus ablation) (linear ablation group). Patients were followed up every 3 months.
resultsDuring a median follow-up of 12 (4-16) months, freedom from atrial fibrillation/atrial tachycardia recurrence was 87.5% in the linear ablation group and 65.1% in the PVI group (P < 0.01). A Cox regression multivariate analysis revealed that ablation strategy group (tailored bi-atrial linear ablation) (HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.12-0.91, P = 0.03) was the only independent predictor of recurrence.
conclusionTailored bi-atrial linear ablation strategy guided by electrophysiological mapping resulted in improved outcomes without compromising safety for patients with PeAF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.