Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39567901›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

Patient safety and climate change: findings from a cross-sectional survey in Germany.

Olga Amberger, Dorothea Lemke, Anette Christ, Hardy Müller, David Schwappach, Max Geraedts, Beate S Müller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Olga AmbergerInstitute of General Practice, Goethe University Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. sawicki@allgemeinmedizin.uni-frankfurt.de.
Dorothea LemkeInstitute of General Practice, Goethe University Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Anette ChristGesundheitsamt Frankfurt Am Main, Breite Gasse 28, 60313, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany.
Hardy MüllerGerman Society for Patient Safety, August-Bebel-Straße 13, 72762, Reutlingen, Germany.
David SchwappachInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University Bern, Mittelstrasse 43, 3012, Bern, Switzerland.
Max GeraedtsInstitute for Health Services Research and Clinical Epidemiology, University of Marburg, Karl-Von-Frisch-Straße 4, 35043, Marburg, Germany.
Beate S MüllerInstitute of General Practice, University of Cologne, 50937, Cologne, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient safety has become a priority issue in health policy strategies in Germany in the last several years, and is especially important in the era of climate change. This study aimed to assess public perceptions about the patient safety impact of climate change and the demographic and socioeconomic factors influencing patient perception in Germany.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted in Germany in 2023, using data from the TK Monitor of Patient Safety. The TK Monitor of Patient Safety is a national survey of the population on the state of safety in medical care. Self-reported data were collected from 1,000 randomly selected adults living in Germany. Demographic and socioeconomic variables were regressed on climate change perception using an ordinal logistic regression approach.

resultsOur results revealed that half of respondents are concerned about climate change affecting their health and 40% of the respondents would like to have climate-sensitive health counseling by their general practitioner. The results showed that demographic variables, such as gender and age, and socioeconomic variables, such as education level and income, are important factors influencing the perception of climate change-related patient safety risks. However, no association was found between urban/rural residence and patient perception.

conclusionsOur study highlights patient safety as a public health concern in the era of climate change. The German public appears to view climate change as harmful to patient safety. Our findings also show that it is necessary to carry out diagnoses focused on demographic and socioeconomic factors to determine which aspects should be strengthened through programs aimed at reducing patient safety risks associated with climate change.

Indexed as

Climate ChangePatient SafetyAdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedPublic OpinionSocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultClimate changePatient safetyPublic Health

Identifiers

PMID39567901
PMCPMC11580531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.