Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39567863›Full record

ArticleMolecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.)2024

Elabela alleviates cuproptosis and vascular calcification in vitaminD3- overloaded mice via regulation of the PPAR-γ /FDX1 signaling.

Rui-Qiang Qi, Yu-Fei Chen, Jing Cheng, Jia-Wei Song, Yi-Hang Chen, Si-Yuan Wang, Ying Liu, Kai-Xin Yan, Xiao-Yan Liu, Jing Li and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Rui-Qiang Qi *Heart Center and Beijing Key Laboratory of Hypertension, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital and Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, China.
Yu-Fei Chen *Heart Center and Beijing Key Laboratory of Hypertension, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital and Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, China.
Jing Cheng *Department of Cardiology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, China.
Jia-Wei SongHeart Center and Beijing Key Laboratory of Hypertension, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital and Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, China.
Yi-Hang ChenHeart Center and Beijing Key Laboratory of Hypertension, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital and Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, China.
Si-Yuan WangHeart Center and Beijing Key Laboratory of Hypertension, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital and Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, China.
Ying LiuHeart Center and Beijing Key Laboratory of Hypertension, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital and Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, China.
Kai-Xin YanHeart Center and Beijing Key Laboratory of Hypertension, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital and Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, China.
Xiao-Yan LiuHeart Center and Beijing Key Laboratory of Hypertension, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital and Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, China.
Jing LiHeart Center and Beijing Key Laboratory of Hypertension, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital and Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, China.
Jiu-Chang ZhongHeart Center and Beijing Key Laboratory of Hypertension, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital and Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, China. jczhong@sina.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2315-3515

Funding

Beijing Natural Science Foundation 7222068the National Natural Science Foundation of China 82370432
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVascular calcification is a crucial pathophysiological process associated with age-related cardiovascular diseases. Elabela, a recently identified peptide, has emerged as a significant player in the regulation of cardiovascular function and homeostasis. However, the effects and underlying mechanisms of Elabela on age-related vascular calcification remain largely unexplored.

methodsIn-vivo vascular calcifications of C57BL/6J mice (8-week-old) and young (8-week-old) or aged (72-week-old) SD rats were injected with vitamin D3 (VitD3) or saline, respectively. Furthermore, the VitD3-overloaded mice received Elabela (1 mg/kg/d), peroxisome proliferators-activated receptor-γ (PPAR-γ) activator Rosiglitazone (5 mg/kg/d) or copper-ionophore Elesclomol (20 mg/kg/d), respectively. As for in-vitro studies, primary rat vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) were isolated from aortas and cultured for explore the role and underlying mechanism of Elabela in vascular calcification.

resultsThere were marked increases in FDX1 and Slc31a1 levels in both aortas and VSMCs during vascular calcification, coinciding with a rise in copper levels and a decrease in Elabela levels. Alizarin red and von-Kossa staining indicated that the administration of Elabela effectively hindered the progression of vascular cuproptosis and arterial calcification in VitD3-overloaded mice and rat arterial rings models. Moreover, Elabela significantly suppressed osteogenic differentiation and calcium deposition in VSMCs and strikingly reversed high phosphate-induced augmentation of FDX1 expression, DLAT aggregation as well as intracellular copper ion levels. More importantly, Elabela exhibited remarkable abilities to prevent mitochondrial dysfunctions in primary rat VSMCs by maintaining mitochondrial membrane potential, inhibiting mitochondrial division, reducing mitochondrial ROS production and increasing ATP levels. Interestingly, Elabela mitigated cellular senescence and production of pro-inflammatory cytokines including IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-18 and TNF-α, respectively. Furthermore, Elabela upregulated the protein levels of PPAR-γ in VitD3-overloaded mice. Administrating PPAR-γ inhibitor GW9662 or blocking the efflux of intracellular copper abolished the protective effect of Elabela on vascular calcification by enhancing levels of FDX1, Slc31a1, Runx2, and BMP2.

conclusionElabela plays a crucial role in protecting against vascular cuproptosis and arterial calcification by activating the PPAR-γ /FDX1 signaling. Elabela supplementation and cuproptosis suppression serve as effective therapeutic approaches for managing vascular calcification and related cardiovascular disorders.

Indexed as

CholecalciferolPPAR gammaSignal TransductionVascular CalcificationAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalHomeodomain ProteinsMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMuscle, Smooth, VascularMyocytes, Smooth MusclePeptide HormonesRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyCholecalciferolHomeodomain ProteinsPeptide HormonesPPAR gammaCuproptosisElabelaPeroxisome proliferators-activated receptor-γVascular calcificationVascular smooth muscle cells

Identifiers

PMID39567863
PMCPMC11577739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.