Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39567766›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Machine learning-based prediction model for brain metastasis in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.

Erha Munai, Siwei Zeng, Ze Yuan, Dingyi Yang, Yong Jiang, Qiang Wang, Yongzhong Wu, Yunyun Zhang, Dan Tao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Erha Munai *School of Medicine, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China.
Siwei Zeng *School of Medicine, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China.
Ze YuanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Dingyi YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Yong JiangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Qiang WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Yongzhong WuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China. cqmdwyz@163.com.
Yunyun ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China. 1120303669@qq.com.
Dan TaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China. taodan@cqu.edu.cn.

Funding

Chongqing Science and Health Joint Medical Research Project No. 2023GGXM002Chongqing Talent Plan No. cstc2022ycjh-bgzxm0208National Natural Science Foundation Project 82073347
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain metastases (BMs) in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) are often associated with poor survival rates and quality of life, making the timely identification of high-risk patients for BMs in ES-SCLC crucial. Patients diagnosed with ES-SCLC between 2010 and 2018 were screened from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Four different machine learning (ML) algorithms were used to create prediction models for BMs in ES-SCLC patients. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, AUROC, and AUPRC were compared among these models and traditional logistic regression (LR). The random forest (RF) model demonstrated the best performance and was chosen for further analysis. The AUROC and AUPRC were calculated and compared. The findings from the RF model were utilized to identify the risk factors linked to BMs in patients diagnosed with ES-SCLC. Examining 4,716 instances of ES-SCLC, the research conducted an analysis, with brain metastases arising in 1,900 cases. Through evaluation of the ROC curve and PRC concerning the RF Model, results depicted an AUROC of 0.896 (95% CI: 0.889-0.899) and AUPRC of 0.900 (95% CI: 0.895-0.904). Test accuracy measured at 0.810 (95% CI: 0.784-0.833), sensitivity at 0.797 (95% CI: 0.756-0.841), and specificity at 0.819 (95% CI: 0.754-0.879). Based on the SHAP analysis of the RF predictive model, the top 10 most relevant features were identified and ranked in order of relative importance: bone metastasis, liver metastasis, radiation, age, tumor size, primary tumor location, N-stage, race, T-stage, and chemotherapy. The research developed and validated a predictive RF model using clinical and pathological data to predict the risk of BMs in patients with ES-SCLC. This model may assist physicians in making clinical decisions that could delay the onset of BMs and improve patient survival rates.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsLung NeoplasmsMachine LearningSmall Cell Lung CarcinomaAdultAgedAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRisk FactorsROC CurveSEER ProgramBrain metastasisExtensive-stage small cell lung cancerMachine learningRandom Forest

Identifiers

PMID39567766
PMCPMC11579493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.