ArticleScientific reports2024
Machine learning-based prediction model for brain metastasis in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- BraMARS: An Interpretable Histopathology-Driven Deep Learning Model for Brain Metastasis Risk Stratification in Surgically Resected Limited-Stage SCLC.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Developing a prediction model to predict the incidence of metastasis in lung cancer patients using artificial intelligence techniques.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Brain Metastasis at Initial Diagnosis in Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Model Development and SHAP Interpretation Study.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Practice disparities in palliative radiation therapy for bone metastases: insights from the Shizuoka Kokuho database study.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Article
- The evolving landscape of brain metastasis: volume II.Trends in cancer · 2026Review
- MRI quantitative imaging biomarkers in differentiating brain parenchymal tuberculoma and lung cancer brain metastases.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Development of machine learning-based prognostic models for small cell lung cancer with brain metastases: an analysis of SEER and Chinese populations.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Survival Prediction in Brain Metastasis Patients Treated with Stereotactic Radiosurgery: A Hybrid Machine Learning Approach.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Interpretable Machine Learning for Survival Prediction in Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients With Brain Metastases: A Population-Based Study With External Validation.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Brain metastases (BMs) in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) are often associated with poor survival rates and quality of life, making the timely identification of high-risk patients for BMs in ES-SCLC crucial. Patients diagnosed with ES-SCLC between 2010 and 2018 were screened from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Four different machine learning (ML) algorithms were used to create prediction models for BMs in ES-SCLC patients. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, AUROC, and AUPRC were compared among these models and traditional logistic regression (LR). The random forest (RF) model demonstrated the best performance and was chosen for further analysis. The AUROC and AUPRC were calculated and compared. The findings from the RF model were utilized to identify the risk factors linked to BMs in patients diagnosed with ES-SCLC. Examining 4,716 instances of ES-SCLC, the research conducted an analysis, with brain metastases arising in 1,900 cases. Through evaluation of the ROC curve and PRC concerning the RF Model, results depicted an AUROC of 0.896 (95% CI: 0.889-0.899) and AUPRC of 0.900 (95% CI: 0.895-0.904). Test accuracy measured at 0.810 (95% CI: 0.784-0.833), sensitivity at 0.797 (95% CI: 0.756-0.841), and specificity at 0.819 (95% CI: 0.754-0.879). Based on the SHAP analysis of the RF predictive model, the top 10 most relevant features were identified and ranked in order of relative importance: bone metastasis, liver metastasis, radiation, age, tumor size, primary tumor location, N-stage, race, T-stage, and chemotherapy. The research developed and validated a predictive RF model using clinical and pathological data to predict the risk of BMs in patients with ES-SCLC. This model may assist physicians in making clinical decisions that could delay the onset of BMs and improve patient survival rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.