ArticleCommunications biology2024
An improved transcriptome annotation reveals asymmetric expression and distinct regulation patterns in allotetraploid common carp.
Article in Communications biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated multi-omics profiling reveals dynamic regulation of light-induced chloroplast biogenesis in Brassica napus seedlings.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Transcriptional Profiling of Common Carp: A Microarray-Based Framework for Aquaculture Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In allotetraploid common carp, protein-coding homoeologs presented divergent expression levels between the two subgenomes. However, whether subgenome dominance occurs in other transcriptional and post-transcriptional events remains unknown. Using Illumina RNA sequencing and PacBio full-length sequencing, we refined the common carp transcriptome annotation and explored differences in four transcriptional and post-transcriptional events between the two subgenomes. The results revealed that the B subgenome presented more alternative splicing events, as did lncRNAs and circRNAs. However, the expression levels, tissue specificity, sequence features, and functions of lncRNAs and circRNAs did not significantly differ between the two subgenomes, suggesting a common regulatory mechanism shared by the two subgenomes. Furthermore, both the number and base substitution frequency of RNA editing events were greater in the B subgenome. Functional analyses of these transcriptional events also revealed subgenome bias. Genes that undergo alternative splicing in the A subgenome participate in more biological processes, and lncRNA targets show a preference between subgenomes. CircRNA host genes in the B subgenome were associated with more biological functions, and RNA editing preferentially occurred in noncoding regions or led to nonsynonymous mutations in the B subgenome. Taken together, the refined transcriptome annotation revealed complicated and imbalanced expression strategies in allotetraploid common carp.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.