Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39567741›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2025

Biobanking with genetics shapes precision medicine and global health.

C Scott Gallagher, Geoffrey S Ginsburg, Anjené Musick

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Polygenic risk scores in clinical applications - opportunities and challenges.Medizinische Genetik : Mitteilungsblatt des Berufsverbandes Medizinische Genetik e.V · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

C Scott GallagherAll of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Geoffrey S GinsburgAll of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Anjené MusickAll of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. anjene.musick@nih.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7770-299X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Precision medicine provides patients with access to personally tailored treatments based on individual-level data. However, developing personalized therapies requires analyses with substantial statistical power to map genetic and epidemiologic associations that ultimately create models informing clinical decisions. As one solution, biobanks have emerged as large-scale, longitudinal cohort studies with long-term storage of biological specimens and health information, including electronic health records and participant survey responses. By providing access to individual-level data for genotype-phenotype mapping efforts, pharmacogenomic studies, polygenic risk score assessments and rare variant analyses, biobanks support ongoing and future precision medicine research. Notably, due in part to the geographical enrichment of biobanks in Western Europe and North America, European ancestries have become disproportionately over-represented in precision medicine research. Herein, we provide a genetics-focused review of biobanks from around the world that are in pursuit of supporting precision medicine. We discuss the limitations of their designs, ongoing efforts to diversify genomics research and strategies to maximize the benefits of research leveraging biobanks for all.

Indexed as

Biological Specimen BanksGlobal HealthPrecision MedicineGenomicsHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.