Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39567722›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2024

The quality and safety of using generative AI to produce patient-centred discharge instructions.

Kristian Stanceski, Sharleen Zhong, Xumou Zhang, Sam Khadra, Marguerite Tracy, Linda Koria, Sarita Lo, Vasi Naganathan, Jinman Kim, Adam G Dunn and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Artificial intelligence as cognitive support in emergency medicine.Clinical and experimental emergency medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kristian StanceskiBiomedical Informatics and Digital Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5165-4096
Sharleen ZhongSchool of Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-2485-0332
Xumou ZhangSchool of Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-6798-1204
Sam KhadraRoyal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Marguerite TracySydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1247-6412
Linda KoriaCentre for Education and Research on Ageing, Department of Geriatric Medicine, Concord Repatriation Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Sarita LoCentre for Education and Research on Ageing, Department of Geriatric Medicine, Concord Repatriation Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Vasi NaganathanCentre for Education and Research on Ageing, Department of Geriatric Medicine, Concord Repatriation Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Jinman KimSchool of Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Adam G DunnBiomedical Informatics and Digital Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. adam.dunn@sydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1720-8209
Julie AyreSydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5279-5189

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient-centred instructions on discharge can improve adherence and outcomes. Using GPT-3.5 to generate patient-centred discharge instructions, we evaluated responses for safety, accuracy and language simplification. When tested on 100 discharge summaries from MIMIC-IV, potentially harmful safety issues attributable to the AI tool were found in 18%, including 6% with hallucinations and 3% with new medications. AI tools can generate patient-centred discharge instructions, but careful implementation is needed to avoid harms.

Identifiers

PMID39567722
PMCPMC11579500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.