ArticleScientific reports2024
Nomogram for predicting all-cause mortality and cancer-specific mortality after TURBT for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The main purpose of this study was to construct two nomograms to predict all-cause mortality (ACM) and cause-specific mortality (CSM) in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients after transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TURBTs). We selected NMIBC patients who underwent TURBT between 2004 and 2017 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The patients were randomly divided into a training set and a validation set at a ratio of 7:3. The independent influencing factors of ACM and CSM in the training set were determined by univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. We then integrated those independent influencing factors to construct nomograms. These prediction nomograms were further verified in the validation set. The C-index, calibration curve, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and decision curve analysis (DCA) curve were used to evaluate the identification, calibration, predictive ability and clinical effectiveness of the nomograms. A total of 28,086 cases were ultimately included in this study, which were divided into a training set (19,661 individuals) and a validation set (8425 individuals). Nine variables, including age at diagnosis, race, marital status, tumor grade, T stage, tumor size, number of tumors, and primary site, were obtained via multivariate Cox regression of the training set and used to construct two nomograms prediction model. The C-index values for the ACM nomogram were 0.743 and 0.741 for the training and validation sets, respectively. Moreover, the corresponding values of the C-index for the CSM nomogram were 0.785 and 0.786, respectively. The ROC curves, calibration curves, and DCA curves showed good predictive performance. The nomograms can assist clinicians in identifying high-risk populations and devising more individualized treatment strategies for NMIBC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.