ArticleScientific reports2024
Development of a simple prediction model for cowpea yield under environmentally growth-restricted conditions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
New and simple crop yield prediction methods are expected to be developed owing to the increasing environmental stress caused by climate change. Algorithms of machine learning could be a powerful tool for predicting crop yield; however, the required feature variables and differences in their prediction accuracy are poorly addressed. The objectives of this study were to identify the best combination of feature variables to predict the yield of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata), which is widely grown in central Sudan Savanna under environmentally restricted conditions, and clarify the differences in the accuracy of major machine learning algorithms. The study also explored the environmental and plant factors affecting the prediction errors. Sample data were obtained from cowpea field experiments in central Sudan Savanna. The prediction was performed using 28 models, encompassing four machine learning algorithms and seven combinations of feature variables. Support Vector Regression and Neural Network algorithms effectively predicted cowpea yields using continuous leaf coverage rates as feature variables; however, some differences were observed in their prediction accuracy depending on the soil types and growth habits. The use of feature variables that are related to shoot growth and plant physiological status could minimize prediction errors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.