Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39567676›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Development of a simple prediction model for cowpea yield under environmentally growth-restricted conditions.

Yoshihiro Hirooka, Shuhei Eda, Kenta Ikazaki, Joseph B Batieno, Kohtaro Iseki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yoshihiro HirookaGraduate School of Agriculture, Kindai University, Nara, Nara, 631-8505, Japan. hirooka@nara.kindai.ac.jp.
Shuhei EdaFreelance, Redmond, WA, USA.
Kenta IkazakiJapan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences (JIRCAS), Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Joseph B BatienoInstitut de l'Environnement et de Recherches Agricoles (INERA), Station de Kamboinse B.P. 476, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Kohtaro IsekiJapan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences (JIRCAS), Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 21K14841
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New and simple crop yield prediction methods are expected to be developed owing to the increasing environmental stress caused by climate change. Algorithms of machine learning could be a powerful tool for predicting crop yield; however, the required feature variables and differences in their prediction accuracy are poorly addressed. The objectives of this study were to identify the best combination of feature variables to predict the yield of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata), which is widely grown in central Sudan Savanna under environmentally restricted conditions, and clarify the differences in the accuracy of major machine learning algorithms. The study also explored the environmental and plant factors affecting the prediction errors. Sample data were obtained from cowpea field experiments in central Sudan Savanna. The prediction was performed using 28 models, encompassing four machine learning algorithms and seven combinations of feature variables. Support Vector Regression and Neural Network algorithms effectively predicted cowpea yields using continuous leaf coverage rates as feature variables; however, some differences were observed in their prediction accuracy depending on the soil types and growth habits. The use of feature variables that are related to shoot growth and plant physiological status could minimize prediction errors.

Indexed as

VignaAlgorithmsClimate ChangeCrops, AgriculturalMachine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerPlant LeavesSoilSoilCowpeaGrowth habitMachine learningSoil typeYield prediction

Identifiers

PMID39567676
PMCPMC11579339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.