Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39567674›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of impotence research2025

Nerve graft for erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy: animal study and clinical data-a narrative review.

Tung Shu, Danqing Ren, Yanna Cao, Run Wang

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of impotence research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tung Shu *Division of Urology, University of Texas McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. tung.shu@uth.tmc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-8712-3650
Danqing Ren *Division of Urology, University of Texas McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-2965-3527
Yanna CaoDepartment of Surgery, University of Texas McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Run WangDivision of Urology, University of Texas McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. runwang@mdanderson.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6635-4093

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduced in the late 1990s, nerve grafting, particularly with sural and genitofemoral nerves, aims to enhance erectile function recovery when neurovascular bundles cannot be preserved following radical prostatectomy. Over the past three decades, researchers have conducted numerous animal and clinical studies to explore the application and clinical effectiveness of this method, with the hope of benefiting patients suffering from erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy. Animal studies have demonstrated the potential of various grafting materials, including autologous nerve and vein grafts, and bioengineered grafts, in promoting nerve regeneration and erectile function recovery. Clinical studies, especially those focusing on sural and genitofemoral nerve grafts, have shown mixed results with varied success rates due to methodological weaknesses and small sample sizes. This review thoroughly incorporates current data, explores emerging nerve grafting methods, demonstrates the complexity of nerve grafting outcomes, and emphasizes the necessity for continuous research, including multi-institutional randomized controlled trials, to establish standardized protocols and optimize patient selection for nerve grafting in the management of erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy.

Indexed as

Erectile DysfunctionPostoperative ComplicationsProstatectomyAnimalsHumansMaleNerve RegenerationPenile ErectionPenis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.