ArticleScientific reports2024
Accurate modeling of crude oil and brine interfacial tension via robust machine learning approaches.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Internal-salt-regulated stability of brine-in-oil emulsions: interfacial mechanisms and bulk-property effects.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Predicting Surfactant Oil-Water Interfacial Tension Using Gated Message-Passing Graph Neural Networks.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Effects of temperature, brine, and inhibitor chemistry on emulsion stability in gas condensate systems under pipeline mixing conditions.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Exploring cross-regional and cross-variable transferability of a ResNet-based super-resolution method for the ERA5 data.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interfacial tension (IFT) between water and crude oil is a crucial variable that enhanced oil recovery (EOR) techniques can adjust to increase oil extraction from depleted fields. Most of the developed intelligent models in the literature are based on synthetic oil samples rather than real crude oil samples or brine total salinity rather than salinity of each salt type. Hence, this study applies various machine learning approaches, such as Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost), Decision Trees (DT), Random Forest (RF), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Ensemble Learning, Support Vector Machines (SVM), and Multi-Layer Perceptron Artificial Neural Networks (MLP-ANN) to develop advanced models for predicting the IFT between brine and crude oil considering real crude oil samples and taking the account of each salt type prevalent within the brine phase, which represent the realistic circumstances encountered in the oil reservoirs. These predictions are based on factors like the type and concentration of salt, the API of the crude oil, and the properties of the system (pressure and temperature) using previously published experimental data. A sensitivity analysis, incorporating a relevancy factor, is performed to highlight the influence of various input parameters on the IFT. Among these models, the Decision Tree is highlighted for its high accuracy and low training cost compared to ANN-based models, as evidenced by its emerged evaluation metrics (R-squared of 0.9796 and mean square error of 5e-4). It is noted that the AdaBoost model is the least accurate with an R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.