Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39567634›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

PupilMetrics: a support system for preprocessing of pupillometric data and extraction of outcome measures.

Victor Amiot, Mattia Tomasoni, Astrid Minier, Sara Gisselbaek, Aki Kawasaki, Corinne Kostic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Victor Amiot *Platform for Research in Ocular Imaging, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Lausanne, Jules-Gonin Eye Hospital, Fondation Asile des Aveugles, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Mattia Tomasoni *Platform for Research in Ocular Imaging, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Lausanne, Jules-Gonin Eye Hospital, Fondation Asile des Aveugles, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Astrid MinierPupillography Lab, Neuro-Ophthalmology Unit, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Lausanne, Jules-Gonin Eye Hospital, Fondation Asile des Aveugles, 15 av. de France, 1004, Lausanne, VD, Switzerland.
Sara GisselbaekPupillography Lab, Neuro-Ophthalmology Unit, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Lausanne, Jules-Gonin Eye Hospital, Fondation Asile des Aveugles, 15 av. de France, 1004, Lausanne, VD, Switzerland.
Aki KawasakiPupillography Lab, Neuro-Ophthalmology Unit, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Lausanne, Jules-Gonin Eye Hospital, Fondation Asile des Aveugles, 15 av. de France, 1004, Lausanne, VD, Switzerland. aki.kawasaki@fa2.ch.
Corinne KosticRetinal Disorder Research Group, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Lausanne, Jules-Gonin Eye Hospital, Fondation Asile des Aveugles, 15 av. de France, 1004, Lausanne, VD, Switzerland. corinne.kostic@fa2.ch.

Funding

Fondation Kattenburg RETPUP
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid pupillary constriction to an abrupt light stimulus is signaled through an oligosynaptic neural pathway that dominates over other supranuclear influences on pupillary movement. A pupillometric recording of the pupil light reflex shows the steep change in pupil size from baseline to maximal constriction. However, when the pupil is recorded in darkness in the phase after light stimulation or in response to non-light stimuli like a sudden noise or cognitive activity, pupil size changes are small and slow. In such cases, pre-processing of pupil recordings to reduce the noise due to intrusion of various artifactual and non-evoked pupillary movements is particularly important but may be time-consuming. To address the paucity of automated tools for pupil light reflex analysis in pupillometry, we aimed to develop a software for automated, user-guided pupillometric data analysis. We identified two types of commonly observed artifacts on pupil recordings. We designed a software, called PupilMetrics, which imports and displays raw pupil data, detects and removes these two types of artifacts, and quantifies outcome measures like pupil size, response time, maximal contraction amplitude and PIPR. The right pupil of 29 healthy adults was recorded using a Neurolight pupillometer (IDMed, Marseilles) in response to 9 different light stimuli. Data analysis of the total 261 pupil responses were performed manually or automatically using PupilMetrics. High correlation was observed between PupilMetrics and manual analysis outcome measures across all stimuli (average R

Indexed as

PupilReflex, PupillarySoftwareAdultArtifactsFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationYoung AdultPost-illumination pupil responsePupilPupil light reflexPupillometry

Identifiers

PMID39567634
PMCPMC11579351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.