Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39567590›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Insights on earthquake nucleation revealed by numerical simulation and unsupervised machine learning of laboratory-scale earthquake.

Sheng Hua Ye, Semechah K Y Lui, R Paul Young

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sheng Hua YeCivil and Mineral Engineering, University of Toronto, 35 St. George St, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A4, Canada. will.ye@mail.utoronto.ca.
Semechah K Y LuiChemical and Physical Sciences, University of Toronto Mississauga, 3359 Mississauga Road, Mississauga, ON, L5L 1C6, Canada.
R Paul YoungCivil and Mineral Engineering, University of Toronto, 35 St. George St, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A4, Canada.

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada 2016-05710Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada 2019-06482
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding earthquake nucleation is vital for predicting and mitigating seismic events, saving lives, and enhancing construction practices in earthquake-prone areas. Cascade triggering and preslip triggering are prevalent theories, posing challenges in differentiation based on field observations. Our study employs a novel unsupervised machine learning pipeline, integrating macroscopic- and grain-scale data from stick-slip experiments in a discrete element method (DEM) framework. Running 27 simulations, we cluster foreshocks and mainshocks separately and assess their correlation. The study supports the cascade triggering model on the macro-scale, as we did not observe any scaling between nucleation parameters and the mainshock size. On the other hand, further grain-scale analysis identifies that, separate from Coulomb stress transfer, there is an additional mechanism related to shear stress accumulation on the fault, which is likely the preslip triggering. Overall, while foreshocks may not directly influence the trend at which contact force evolves, they could prime the fault for dynamic rupture by increasing the proportion of contacts accumulating shear stresses. Our findings infer the possible coexistence of the two theorized mechanisms.

Indexed as

Clustering analysisDEMEarthquake nucleationGrain-scaleLaboratory earthquakeMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID39567590
PMCPMC11579008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.