ArticleScientific reports2024
Applying clustered artificial neural networks to enhance contaminant diffusion prediction in geotechnical engineering.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hare escape optimization algorithm with applications in engineering and deep learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Flower fertilization optimization algorithm with application to adaptive controllers.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper introduces a novel approach using Clustered Artificial Neural Networks (CLANN) to address the challenge of developing predictive models for multimodal dataset with extreme parameter values. The CLANN method strategically decomposes the dataset, derived from Finite Element Analysis (FEA), into clusters, each representing distinct diffusion behaviors, and applies specialized neural networks within these clusters. The CLANN model was rigorously evaluated and demonstrated superior accuracy and consistency compared to traditional methods such as the Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) and fuzzy expert systems. While these conventional models struggled to capture the full range of diffusion dynamics, particularly under extreme conditions, CLANN consistently provided predictions that closely aligned with the actual FEA data across all scenarios. The versatility of the CLANN approach extends beyond its application to soil contamination. Its ability to handle complex, multimodal datasets suggests that this methodology can be generalized to a wide range of scientific and engineering problems characterized by similar data structures. This makes CLANN not only a powerful tool for geotechnical engineers but also a promising framework for broader applications where traditional models fall short. The findings of this study pave the way for more accurate, reliable, and adaptable predictive modeling in diverse domains, enhancing our ability to manage and mitigate environmental and engineering challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.