ArticleScientific data2024
A continuous pursuit dataset for online deep learning-based EEG brain-computer interface.
Article in Scientific data, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Dataset Fragmentation, Cognitive Variability, and Reproducibility Challenges in EEG-Based Brain-Computer Interfaces: A PRISMA-Based Systematic Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- Non-Invasive Brain-Computer Interfaces: Converging Frontiers in Neural Signal Decoding and Flexible Bioelectronics Integration.Nano-micro letters · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This dataset is from an EEG brain-computer interface (BCI) study investigating the use of deep learning (DL) for online continuous pursuit (CP) BCI. In this task, subjects use Motor Imagery (MI) to control a cursor to follow a randomly moving target, instead of a single stationary target used in other traditional BCI tasks. DL methods have recently achieved promising performance in traditional BCI tasks, but most studies investigate offline data analysis using DL algorithms. This dataset consists of ~168 hours of EEG recordings from complex CP BCI experiments, collected from 28 unique human subjects over multiple sessions each, with an online DL-based decoder. The large amount of subject specific data from multiple sessions may be useful for developing new BCI decoders, especially DL methods that require large amounts of training data. By providing this dataset to the public, we hope to help facilitate the development of new or improved BCI decoding algorithms for the complex CP paradigm for continuous object control, bringing EEG-based BCIs closer to real-world applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.