ArticleSchizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany)2024
Individuals with psychosis receive less electric field strength during transcranial direct current stimulation compared to healthy controls.
Article in Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Sex differences in schizophrenia: symptomatology, treatment efficacy and adverse effects.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Pooled it
- Dose standardization for transcranial electrical stimulation: an accessible approach.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Peripheral NMDAR subunits as predictors of working memory improvement in schizophrenia.Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Case Report: Lesion network guided transcranial direct current stimulation targeting treatment refractory hallucinations and delusions: a traditional and accelerated stimulation case study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent research has examined the effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) as an adjunctive treatment for antipsychotics, finding mixed results on cognitive, positive, and negative symptoms. We tested if individuals with psychosis have reduced electric field strength compared to healthy controls and assessed the potential causal factors. We hypothesized that either cortical thinning due to the disorder or increased scalp thickness due to secondary effects of the disorder were causal factors. Using the Psychosis Human Connectome Project dataset, we simulated electric field models for 136 individuals with psychosis, 73 first-degree relatives, and 43 healthy controls. We compared group differences of electric field strength at bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC), targeted with two montages (Fp1-Fp2 & F3-Fp2) commonly used to treat cognitive impairment. We additionally compared groups on scalp, skull, and cerebrospinal fluid thickness at bilateral dlPFC and the three electrode locations. Mediation analyses assessed if tissue thickness and BMI were causal factors for group differences while controlling for age and sex. Individuals with psychosis had lower electric field strength for bilateral dlPFC for both montages. Scalp thickness was also greater for individuals with psychosis, but cerebrospinal fluid thickness was not significantly different. BMI was a significant mediator for the group difference seen in both scalp thickness and electric field strength. Future treatment studies using tDCS in the psychosis population should include electric field modeling to assess its effectiveness given the increased risk of obesity. Individualized montages based on head models may also improve effectiveness.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.