Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39567513›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Microbial and mineral interactions decouple litter quality from soil organic matter formation.

Dafydd M O Elias, Kelly E Mason, Tim Goodall, Ashley Taylor, Pengzhi Zhao, Alba Otero-Fariña, Hongmei Chen, Caroline L Peacock, Nicholas J Ostle, Robert Griffiths and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Dafydd M O EliasUK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Lancaster Environment Centre, Library Avenue, Bailrigg, Lancaster, LA1 4AP, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2674-9285
Kelly E MasonUK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Lancaster Environment Centre, Library Avenue, Bailrigg, Lancaster, LA1 4AP, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3426-3178
Tim GoodallUK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, MacLean Building, Benson Lane, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford, OX10 8BB, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1526-4071
Ashley TaylorUK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Lancaster Environment Centre, Library Avenue, Bailrigg, Lancaster, LA1 4AP, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-1241-2013
Pengzhi ZhaoUK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Lancaster Environment Centre, Library Avenue, Bailrigg, Lancaster, LA1 4AP, UK.
Alba Otero-FariñaSchool of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Hongmei ChenLancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Library Ave, Bailrigg, Lancaster, LA1 4YQ, UK.
Caroline L PeacockSchool of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3754-9294
Nicholas J OstleLancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Library Ave, Bailrigg, Lancaster, LA1 4YQ, UK.
Robert GriffithsSchool of Environmental and Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd, LL57 2DG, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3341-4547
Pippa J Chapmanwater@leeds, School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0438-6855
Joseph Holdenwater@leeds, School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1108-4831
Steve BanwartSchool of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7223-6678
Niall P McNamaraUK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Lancaster Environment Centre, Library Avenue, Bailrigg, Lancaster, LA1 4AP, UK.
Jeanette WhitakerUK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Lancaster Environment Centre, Library Avenue, Bailrigg, Lancaster, LA1 4AP, UK. jhart@ceh.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8824-471X

Funding

RCUK | Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) NE/S005137/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current understanding of soil carbon dynamics suggests that plant litter quality and soil mineralogy control the formation of mineral-associated soil organic carbon (SOC). Due to more efficient microbial anabolism, high-quality litter may produce more microbial residues for stabilisation on mineral surfaces. To test these fundamental concepts, we manipulate soil mineralogy using pristine minerals, characterise microbial communities and use stable isotopes to measure decomposition of low- and high-quality litter and mineral stabilisation of litter-C. We find that high-quality litter leads to less (not more) efficient formation of mineral-associated SOC due to soil microbial community shifts which lower carbon use efficiency. Low-quality litter enhances loss of pre-existing SOC resulting in no effect of litter quality on total mineral-associated SOC. However, mineral-associated SOC formation is primarily controlled by soil mineralogy. These findings refute the hypothesis that high-quality plant litters form mineral-associated SOC most efficiently and advance our understanding of how mineralogy and litter-microbial interactions regulate SOC formation.

Identifiers

PMID39567513
PMCPMC11579368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.