ArticleOncogenesis2024
Identification of pancreatic cancer-specific protease substrates for protease-dependent targeted delivery.
Article in Oncogenesis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Linker Design in Antibody-Drug Conjugates: Balancing Stability and Drug Release.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) presents significant challenges due to the inadequacy of existing chemotherapeutics, which often result in toxicity-dependent dose limitations and premature cessation of therapy. Targeted delivery of therapeutic molecules offers a promising solution. Given that PDAC is marked by a desmoplastic reaction with extensive aberrant protease activity, protease-dependent targeted delivery could minimize off-target toxicities and is of increasing interest. The efficacy of targeted delivery hinges on the specificity of the substrates used; insufficient specificity can lead to off-target effects, reducing the advantage over non-targeted methods. Here, we employ an unbiased library approach to screen over 7 million peptide substrates for proteolytic cleavage by PDAC cell lysates, identifying 37 substrates enriched by at least 500-fold after three rounds of selection. As systemically administered targeted delivery depends on the absence of substrate cleavage in circulation, the peptide library was also screened against whole blood lysates, and enriched substrates were removed from the PDAC-enriched dataset to obtain PDAC-specific substrates. In vitro validation using FRET-peptides showed that 13 of the selected 15 substrates are cleaved by a panel of PDAC cell line lysates. Moreover, evaluation against healthy murine organ and human blood lysates to assess off-target cleavage revealed that the identified substrates are indeed PDAC-specific and that several substrates may be superior with respect to PDAC specificity over the CAPN2-responsive substrate, which has recently shown preclinical potential in targeted therapy, but future animal models should address the potential superiority. Overall, we thus identified substrates with high selectivity and sensitivity for PDAC that could be employed in protease-dependent targeted therapies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.