Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39567445›Full record

SynthesisJournal of robotic surgery2024

KangDuo surgical robot versus da Vinci robotic system in urologic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zhi Wen, Yan-Xin Yang, Sha Yu, Qing-Feng Liu, Yu Zhang, Wen-Wen Yang, Le Yang

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-AnalysisComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of robotic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. KangDuoTranslational andrology and urology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zhi Wen *Department of Urology, Langzhong People's Hospital, Nanchong, Sichuan Province, China.
Yan-Xin Yang *Department of Otolaryngology, Langzhong People's Hospital, Nanchong, Sichuan Province, China.
Sha Yu *Department of Urology, Langzhong People's Hospital, Nanchong, Sichuan Province, China.
Qing-Feng LiuDepartment of Urology, Langzhong People's Hospital, Nanchong, Sichuan Province, China.
Yu ZhangDepartment of Urology, Langzhong People's Hospital, Nanchong, Sichuan Province, China.
Wen-Wen YangDepartment of Urology, Langzhong People's Hospital, Nanchong, Sichuan Province, China.
Le YangDepartment of Urology, Langzhong People's Hospital, Nanchong, Sichuan Province, China. uroyang@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It was a systematic review and meta-analysis that aimed to compare the efficiency and safety of robot-assisted urological surgery using both the KangDuo and da Vinci robotic systems. The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for all papers published through September 1, 2024. The focus was on English-language papers comparing the KangDuo surgical robot and the da Vinci system in urological procedures. The screening method focused on RCTs and cohort studies and followed strict criteria. Three cohort studies and two randomised controlled trials with 300 adult urological surgery patients met the inclusion criteria. These 150 patients were operated on with the KangDuo robotic system and 150 with the da Vinci system. The investigation showed that whereas KangDuo operations were slightly longer, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, and postoperative complication rates were similar. The KangDuo robotic system performs urological surgery as well as the da Vinci system, although it takes longer. Future large-scale multicenter randomized trials are recommended to gather further evidence and enhance clinical understanding.

Indexed as

Robotic Surgical ProceduresUrologic Surgical ProceduresBlood Loss, SurgicalHumansLength of StayMaleOperative TimePostoperative Complicationsda VinciKangDuoMeta-analysisRoboticUrology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.