Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39567404›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nutrition2024

Association of low-carbohydrate diet score and carbohydrate quality index with colorectal cancer risk: a large-scale case-control study.

Fang-Ting Lin, Ke-Xin Tu, Qing-Jian Ou, Xue-Qing Deng, Yu-Jing Fang, Cai-Xia Zhang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fang-Ting LinDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Ke-Xin TuDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Qing-Jian OuState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
Xue-Qing DengExperimental Teaching Center, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Yu-Jing FangState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China. fangyj@sysucc.org.cn.
Cai-Xia ZhangDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China. zhangcx3@mail.sysu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9671-9412

Funding

the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation 2021A1515011751the National Natural Science Foundation of China 81973020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCarbohydrate intake has been linked to colorectal cancer (CRC) risk, with variations depending on the quantity and quality of carbohydrates consumed. This study aimed to investigate the association between carbohydrate quantity and quality, using the low-carbohydrate diet score (LCD) and carbohydrate quality index (CQI), and the risk of CRC in the Chinese population.

methodsWe conducted a case-control study in Guangzhou, China, with 2,799 CRC cases and an equal number of sex- and age-matched controls. Dietary data were collected using a validated food frequency questionnaire to derive the LCD and CQI, assessing the quantity and quality of carbohydrate intake separately. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for CRC risk were estimated using unconditional logistic regression models, and restricted cubic splines were used to explore potential non-linear relationships.

resultsThe results demonstrated that higher adherence to the overall LCD score, plant-based LCD score, and CQI was associated with a lower risk of CRC. The adjusted ORs (95%CIs) for the highest quintile of intake in comparison with the lowest quintile were 0.76 (0.63, 0.91) for the overall LCD score, 0.61 (0.50, 0.74) for the plant-based LCD score, and 0.70 (0.58,0.84) for the CQI, respectively. However, the animal-based LCD did not show a significant association with CRC risk, with the adjusted OR (95%CI) for the highest quintile compared to the lowest being 0.98 (0.81, 1.18). Restricted cubic splines analysis showed non-linear associations of the overall LCD score, animal-based LCD score, and plant-based LCD score with CRC risk. In contrast, a linear relationship was observed between CQI and CRC risk (P

conclusionsOur findings indicate that the overall LCD score, the plant-based LCD score, and the CQI were inversely associated with the risk of CRC.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsDietary CarbohydratesDiet, Carbohydrate-RestrictedAdultAgedCase-Control StudiesChinaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioRisk FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesDietary CarbohydratesCarbohydrate intakeCarbohydrate quality indexColorectal cancerLow-carbohydrate diet score

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.