Trial reportEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2024
Virtual reality for surgical training in balloon kyphoplasty procedure.
Trial report in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Identifying the most recommended novel teaching strategy in orthopaedics education: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Holographic Imaging Combined with VR Simulation in Obstetrics and Gynecology Resident Training: A Review on Skill Development and Patient Privacy Protection.International journal of women's health · 2026Review
- Translating behavioral interventions into virtual reality: theFrontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Is virtual reality training for lumbosacral freehand pedicle screw placement an alternative to conventional training?European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of our prospective randomised trial was to demonstrate the efficacy and improvement in surgical skills of inexperienced surgeons in the balloon kyphoplasty procedures trained with virtual reality (VR) compared to untrained inexperienced surgeons.
methodsSix orthopaedic residents were randomized to group VR1 (trained) and group VR0 (untrained, control group). At the beginning, all participants, after a theoretical lesson, performed a virtual kyphoplasty. Each resident of the Group VR1 did four training sessions in 1 month (2 h per week) and at the end of training was re-evaluated performing a virtual kyphoplasty. Residents were evaluated with global task completion time and rates subtask ability according to Global Rating Scale of Operative Performance adaptation (both in VR simulation and during the surgery). A percutaneous vertebral augmentation with balloon kyphoplasty was performed by all residents. Intraoperative parameters, complications and cumulative transfer effectiveness ratio (CTER) were analysed.
resultsIntraoperative scores revealed an improvement in the group VR1 between the first VR trial and the intraoperative phase (2.85 ± 0.65 vs. 4.09 ± 0.62, P < 0.05), which was not seen in the group VR0 (2.71 ± 0.71 vs. 2.85 ± 0.75). Statistical analyses indicated significant differences in intraoperative scores between the two groups. The CTER was 0.85 and suggests that 10 training sessions could reduce the procedure time by approximately 8 min in a 15 min of surgery.
conclusionOur study about the balloon kyphoplasy reaffirms the potential of VR as an effective and cost-efficient training tool, bridging the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical execution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39567395What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.