Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39567352›Full record

ReviewJournal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing2025

Low-value and high-value care recommendations in nursing: A systematic assessment of clinical practice guidelines.

Wilmieke Bahlman-van Ooijen, Jeltje Giesen, Annick Bakker-Jacobs, Hester Vermeulen, Getty Huisman-de Waal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Low-value and high-value care recommendations in nursing: A systematic assessment of clinical practice guidelines.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wilmieke Bahlman-van OoijenDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9251-4874
Jeltje GiesenScientific Center for Quality of Health (IQ Health), Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Annick Bakker-JacobsScientific Center for Quality of Health (IQ Health), Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Hester VermeulenScientific Center for Quality of Health (IQ Health), Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Getty Huisman-de WaalDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

ZonMw 50015246
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe World Health Organization defines quality of care as providing effective, evidence-based care, and avoiding harm. Low-value care provides little or no benefit to the patient, causes harm, and wastes limited resources. In 2017, shortly after the start of the International Choosing Wisely campaign, the first Dutch nursing "Do-not-do" list was published and has become a widely used practical tool for nurses working in daily practice. However, over the last years new guidelines are published. Therefore, an update of the list is necessary with an addition of high-value care recommendations as alternative care practices for low-value care. DESIGN/

methodsIn this study, a combination of designs was used. First, we searched Dutch clinical practice guidelines for low-value or high-value care recommendations. All nursing care recommendations were assessed and specified to several healthcare sectors, including hospital care, district care, nursing home care, disability care, and mental health care. Second, a prioritization among nurses regarding low-value care recommendations was done by a cross-sectional survey for each healthcare sector.

resultsIn total, 66 low-value care recommendations were found, for example, "avoid unnecessary layers under the patient at risk of pressure ulcers" and "never flush the bladder to prevent urinary tract infection." Furthermore, 414 high-value care recommendations were selected, such as "use the Barthel Index to assess and to evaluate the degree of ADL independence" and "application of cold therapy may be considered for oncological patients with pain." In total, 539 nurses from all healthcare sectors prioritized the low-value care recommendations, resulting in a top five low-value care practices per healthcare sector. The top five low-value care recommendations differed per healthcare sector, although "do not use physical restraints in case of a delirium" was prioritized by four out of five sectors.

conclusionsAssessing low-value and high-value care recommendations for nurses will help and inspire nurses to deliver fundamental care for their patients. These initiatives regarding low-value and high-value care are essential to generate a culture of continuous quality improvement based on evidence. This is also essential to meeting the current challenges of the healthcare delivery system. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This paper provides an update of low-value care recommendations for nurses based on Dutch guidelines from 2017 to 2023, specified to five healthcare sectors, including hospital care, district care, nursing home care, disability care and mental health care, with an accompanying prioritization of these low-value care recommendations to facilitate de-implementation. This paper provides a first overview of high-value care recommendations to reflect on and create alternative care practices for low-value care. The recommendations regarding low-value and high-value care are essential to generate a culture of continuous improvement of appropriateness based on evidence, finally leading to better quality of care and improving patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Nursing CarePractice Guidelines as TopicQuality of Health CareCross-Sectional StudiesHumansNetherlandsappropriatenesschoosing wiselyclinical practice guidelineshigh‐value carelow‐value carenursing

Identifiers

PMID39567352
PMCPMC12064838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.