ArticleJournal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation2024
The Prevalence of Creak Across Breath Groups in Adductor Laryngeal Dystonia.
Article in Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Linguistically Informed Automated Estimates of Creak in Adductor Laryngeal Dystonia.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2026Article
- The Effects of Lexical Stress, Lexical Type, and Voicing Context on Symptom Expression in Individuals With Adductor Laryngeal Dystonia.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2026Article
- Creak Derived from CAPE-V Sentences in Patients with AdLd and pMTD.Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation · 2026Article
- Physiological Correlates of the Spectral Aggregate of the High-Passed Fundamental Frequency in Adductor Laryngeal Dystonia.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2026Article
- Automated Creak Detection in Spanish Speakers with and without AdLD.Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveCreak is an acoustic feature found to discriminate speakers with adductor laryngeal dystonia (AdLD) from typical speakers with outstanding diagnostic accuracy. Yet creak is also used by typical speakers as a phrase-boundary marker. This study aims to compare the prevalence of creak across estimated breath groups in speakers with AdLD and controls to delineate physiological mechanisms underlying creak in AdLD.
methodsThirty-four speakers read aloud the first paragraph of the Rainbow Passage (17 diagnosed with AdLD and 17 with no history of voice complaints). "Breath-like" pauses were defined as any in which technicians audibly heard a pause and all pauses >500 ms. For each phoneme, the time preceding the next breath-like pause was calculated, and the probability of creak occurrence was calculated. A generalized linear mixed-effects model was performed to determine the relationship between creak and time preceding a breath-like pause.
resultsInter-rater and intrarater reliability of technicians were excellent. There was a statistically greater probability of creak in the AdLD group compared to controls (22% vs. 5%) and a statistically greater probability of creak as speakers approached a breath-like pause in both groups. The interaction between the time preceding a breath-like pause and group was significant, with a stronger relationship between the time preceding a breath-like pause and creak for control speakers (P < 0.001).
conclusionsCreak is more prevalent in speakers with AdLD and may not only be related to respiratory phrasing but possibly in response to or because of the hyperadduction of the vocal folds during a laryngeal spasm. LAY SUMMARY: The probability of creak occurring was greater towards the end of estimated breath groups in speakers with and without AdLD; however, for speakers with AdLD, creak was more prominent across the entire breath group. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.