Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39567231›Full record

ArticleBJGP open2025

Discussing poverty within primary care consultations: implications for mental health support.

Felicity Thomas, Katrina Wyatt, Kathryn Berzins, Ilse Lee, Jane Horrell, Alison McLoughlin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJGP open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Felicity ThomasDepartment for Health and Community Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK f.thomas@exeter.ac.uk.
Katrina WyattDepartment for Health and Community Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Kathryn BerzinsHealth Technology Assessment Unit, Applied Health Research Hub, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.
Ilse LeeUCLPartners, London, UK.
Jane HorrellFaculty of Health: Medicine, Dentistry and Human Sciences, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
Alison McLoughlinRoyal Blackburn Teaching Hospital, Blackburn, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoverty can have significant impacts on health and wellbeing. However, asking patients about their broader socioeconomic circumstances is not routine within primary care consultations.

aimTo understand healthcare professionals' experiences of communicating with patients about their socioeconomic circumstances and how a bespoke training programme supported these conversations in routine consultations. DESIGN &

settingHealthcare professionals from 30 GP practices across England received training to improve understanding and communication with patients about the ways that poverty impacted their mental health.

methodSemi-structured interviews were undertaken with 49 GPs and allied health professionals to understand barriers and enablers to communication around poverty and the impact of the training on their consultation practice.

resultsHealth professionals often lacked confidence in discussing socioeconomic issues and welcomed information on how to do this sensitively. Asking questions about poverty-related stresses was felt to lead to better understanding of the causes of mental distress, avoidance of problematic assumptions and inappropriate antidepressant prescribing, and to enable more coordinated and appropriate support from practice teams.

conclusionAsking patients about their socioeconomic circumstances can facilitate provision of appropriate support.

Indexed as

Difficult conversationsMental healthPovertyPrimary health careSocioeconomic factors

Identifiers

PMID39567231
PMCPMC12421269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.