Observational studyRevista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social2024
[Validity of visual inspection with acetic acid versus cervical cytology].
Observational study in Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Precancerous lesions, conditions associated with exposure to human papillomavirus (HPV), threaten women's health at different stages of life, from adolescence to old age. It has been observed that a low-cost strategy, such as visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA), reveals cervical lesions, while establishing interventions that allow modifying the course of the disease, thus improving women's quality of life. Objective: To determine the validity of VIA in comparison with cervical cytology for the detection of precancerous lesions. Material and methods: Descriptive, observational, cross-sectional, prospective, analytical study. The type of sampling was non-probabilistic. The sample consisted of 638 participants. Data were collected with a data collection form and analyzed quantitatively with the SPSS software. The study complied with the provisions of the General Health Law on Research in Mexico and was approved by the local research committee of the Mexican Institute for Social Security (IMSS, according to its initials in Spanish). Results: VIA compared with cervical cytology showed a sensitivity of 75%, a specificity of 98%, a positive predictive value of 47%, a negative predictive value of 99%, a positive post-test probability of 97%, and a concordance of 61%. Conclusion: VIA showed an acceptable sensitivity and can be used as a screening test in conjunction with cytology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.