ArticleInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2025
Evaluating Collection Time of Intragastric Fluid During Endoscopy for Point-of-care Test-based Helicobacter pylori Polymerase Chain Reaction.
Article in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Usefulness of Molecular Diagnostic Kits for Detecting Helicobacter pylori Infection in Patients Receiving Proton Pump Inhibitors and Potassium-Competitive Acid Blockers.BioMed research international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the influence of sample collection time during esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) on the accuracy of a newly approved point-of-care test (POCT)-based polymerase chain reaction kit for detecting Helicobacter pylori and clarithromycin susceptibility in gastric wash fluid. Methods Intragastric fluid was collected at three time points: Collection Time 1 (start of EGD), Collection Time 2 (during EGD), and Collection Time 3 (after indigo carmine spraying). POCT-based quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) targeting 23S rRNA domain V (2142/2143) was used to quantify H. pylori DNA in the collected fluid at all three time points and compared with qPCR targeting 16S rRNA. Patients Fifty patients with suspected H. pylori infection were consecutively enrolled in this study over a three-month period and underwent EGD. Results In 9 out of 50 EGD cases that were H. pylori-positive, no significant differences in H. pylori DNA content, quantified using POCT-based qPCR targeting 23S rRNA, were observed between the three collection times: 1 vs. 2, p=0.81; 2 vs. 3, p=0.59; 1 vs. 3. Collection Time 2 had the strongest inverse correlation with the urea breath test (r=-0.80, p=0.01) and was the only time-point at which POCT-based qPCR could detect H. pylori in case 15. Conclusion This study suggests that the optimal collection timing for the H. pylori detection POCT kit (within 60 min) using intragastric fluid (with no biopsy) may be during EGD (Collection Time 2). However, our study had a limited sample size, so the findings must be verified through large-scale, multicenter collaboration studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.