Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39566973›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2024

Nurse and doctor turnover and patient outcomes in NHS acute trusts in England: retrospective longitudinal study.

Giuseppe Moscelli, Marco Mello, Melisa Sayli, Adrian Boyle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Giuseppe MoscelliEconomics Department, School of Social Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, UK g.moscelli@surrey.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-0675-1564
Marco MelloEconomics Department, Business School, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1323-3087
Melisa SayliEconomics Department, School of Social Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5286-6373
Adrian BoyleEmergency Department Cambridge University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9009-5423

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the association between monthly turnover rates of hospital nurses and senior doctors and patient health outcomes (mortality and unplanned hospital readmissions).

designRetrospective longitudinal study.

settingAll 148 NHS acute trusts in England (1 April 2010 to 30 March 2019), excluding specialist and community NHS hospital trusts.

participantsYearly records on 236 000 nurses, 41 800 senior doctors (specialist, associate specialist and specialty doctors, and consultants), and 8.1 million patients admitted to hospital.

main outcome measuresThe panel data regression analysis used nine years of monthly observations from administrative datasets at healthcare worker and patient levels. Associations using linear and unconditional quantile regressions were estimated, including controls for seasonality and NHS hospital trust. Four hospital quality indicators (risk adjusted by patient age, sex, and Charlson index comorbidities) were used and measured at a monthly frequency on a percentage scale: mortality risk within 30 days from all cause, emergency, or elective admission to hospital, and risk of unplanned emergency readmission within 30 days from discharge after elective hospital treatment.

resultsA 1 standard deviation (SD) increase in turnover rate for nurses was associated with 0.035 (95% confidence interval 0.024 to 0.045) and 0.052 (0.037 to 0.067) percentage point increases in risks of all cause and emergency admission mortality, respectively, at 30 days. The corresponding values for senior doctors were 0.014 (0.005 to 0.024) and 0.019 (0.006 to 0.033) percentage point increases. Higher nurse turnover rate was associated with higher mortality risk at 30 days in surgical (P<0.01) and general medicine (P<0.01) specialties, as well as mortality for patients admitted to hospital with infectious and parasitic diseases (international classification of diseases, 10th revision; P<0.05) and injury, poisoning, and consequences of external causes (P<0.01). Higher turnover rates for senior doctors were associated with higher mortality risk at 30 days for patients admitted to hospital with infectious and parasitic diseases (P<0.05), mental and behavioural disorders (P<0.05), and diseases of the respiratory system (P<0.05). Turnover rates for hospital nurses and senior doctors were not statistically significantly associated with risk adjusted hospital mortality and unplanned emergency readmissions for elective patients.

conclusionsLower turnover rates for nurses and senior doctors at hospital level were associated with better health outcomes for patients with emergency hospital admissions. STUDY REGISTRATION: Integrated Research Application System project ID 271302.

Indexed as

Nursing Staff, HospitalPatient ReadmissionPersonnel TurnoverState MedicineEnglandFemaleHospital MortalityHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMedical Staff, HospitalMiddle AgedPhysiciansQuality Indicators, Health CareRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID39566973
PMCPMC11577445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.