Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39566955›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Ethical issues in termination of resuscitation decision-making: an interview study with paramedics and relatives of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest non-survivors.

Karin Eli, Caroline J Huxley, Galina Gardiner, Gavin D Perkins, Michael A Smyth, Frances Griffiths, Anne-Marie Slowther

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Karin EliWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK Karin.Eli@warwick.ac.uk A-M.Slowther@warwick.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9132-8404
Caroline J HuxleyWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Galina GardinerWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Gavin D PerkinsWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Michael A SmythWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0220-2223
Frances GriffithsWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4173-1438
Anne-Marie SlowtherWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK Karin.Eli@warwick.ac.uk A-M.Slowther@warwick.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3338-8457

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), decisions to terminate resuscitation or transport the patient to hospital are ethically fraught. However, little is known about paramedics' ethical concerns in these decision-making processes.

objectiveTo develop an understanding of how paramedics experience ethical concerns in OHCA decision-making processes, and how this relates to the ethical concerns of patients' relatives.

designA qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with paramedics and relatives of OHCA non-survivors.

settingTwo ambulance trusts in England.

participantsThirty-one paramedics, identified as decision-makers in adult OHCA events in which cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) had been initiated, were interviewed. Fourteen interviews with relatives of OHCA non-survivors were also conducted. ANALYSIS: The interviews were analysed thematically, using a coding framework and following an empirical ethics approach.

resultsFour themes were developed: preventing harm to patients, best interests, caring for the patient's family and moral distress. Paramedics conceptualised preventing harm both as saving lives and as preventing an undignified death or a life with severe brain damage. Paramedics' and relatives' views of best interests were influenced by values such as patient dignity and assumptions about age and quality of life. Paramedics expressed a duty of care towards the patient's family. Relatives conveyed the importance of clear communication and acts of care performed by the ambulance crew, underscoring the ethical commitment that paramedics had towards patients' families. Paramedics described decision-making processes that relied on clinical guidelines, rather than personal values and beliefs; this sometimes led to moral distress.

conclusionNon-protocolised ethical considerations are important in paramedic decision-making about terminating CPR in OHCA events. While paramedics use established guidelines and processes to reach decisions that prevent patient harm, they experience moral distress when personal convictions clash with guidelines. Training around ethical reasoning and decision making may help paramedics reduce their moral distress and provide consistent and transparent decisions for patients and their families.

Indexed as

Allied Health PersonnelCardiopulmonary ResuscitationDecision MakingFamilyOut-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestQualitative ResearchAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelEmergency Medical ServicesEmergency Medical TechniciansEnglandFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle Agedaccident & emergency medicinecardiopulmonary resuscitationmedical ethicsqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID39566955
PMCPMC11580266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.