ArticleBMJ open2024
Osteoporosis management in a rural community hospital in Japan: a cross-sectional retrospective study.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Investigation of Bisphosphonate Therapy for Osteoporosis: A Single-Center Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of general and family medicine · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesOsteoporosis is a condition characterised by decreased bone strength and an increased risk of fragility fractures. Its prevalence is increasing in developed countries, highlighting the need for appropriate diagnosis and intervention. However, in practice, adequate testing and treatment are not often provided. Therefore, in this study, we investigated the status of osteoporosis management in a rural community hospital in Japan.
designCross-sectional retrospective study.
settingDepartment of General Medicine from a rural community hospital in Japan.
participantsA total of 984 women aged≥65 years who were recommended to undergo osteoporosis screening were included. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Bone mineral density (BMD) testing rates and characteristics of patients who underwent these tests, including diagnosis and treatment rates for osteoporosis.
resultsThe BMD testing rate was 14%. Despite being at risk of osteoporosis, older patients and those requiring nursing care had a lower rate of testing. The proportion of patients diagnosed with osteoporosis was 41%, and the treatment rate was 19%.
conclusionsThe management of osteoporosis in a rural Japanese community hospital was found to be inadequate. The rate of BMD testing was low, particularly among older adults and those requiring nursing care. This finding suggests that osteoporosis may be underdiagnosed in many cases in this population or diagnosed but not appropriately followed up. Further cohort studies and intervention strategies are needed to fully investigate these issues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.