Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39566937›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Gender differences in burnout among US nurse leaders during COVID-19 pandemic: an online cross-sectional survey study.

Latifah Alenezi, Gordon Lee Gillespie, Carolyn Smith, Kermit G Davis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Latifah AleneziDepartment of Nursing, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences College of Nursing Riyadh, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia enezil@ksau-hs.edu.sa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-4832-4686
Gordon Lee GillespieDepartment of Nursing, University of Cincinnati College of Nursing, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Carolyn SmithDepartment of Nursing, University of Cincinnati College of Nursing, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Kermit G DavisUniversity of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAmong nurse leaders, gender should receive particular attention, because life and work experiences and burnout during COVID-19 pandemic may vary between women and men, potentially requiring different strategies to achieve well-being. Thus, information about gender differences in burnout might be critical to burnout prevention in nurse leaders. Additionally, there has been a substantial call for attention to gender during the COVID-19 pandemic, reflecting a concern that responses to the pandemic that fail to consider gender differences and norms will be ineffective. Therefore, the objective of the current study is to examine personal burnout, client burnout and work-related burnout of nurse leaders while considering the impact of COVID-19 pandemic and work-life balance through a gender lens.

designA cross-sectional study design was implemented in 2023 using a convenience sampling approach.

settingData on personal burnout, work-related burnout, client burnout, work-life balance and COVID-19 impact were collected electronically and assessed through a gender lens.

participantsA sample of 210 nurse leaders filled out the online surveys that were posted on the American Organization for Nursing Leadership and on Facebook.

conclusionFemales had significantly higher personal burnout than males (mean 56.2 vs 49.3, F=5.853, p=0.019). Males had significantly higher client-related burnout than females (mean 45.3 vs 34.8, F=7.014, p=0.008). Findings demonstrate the importance of addressing gender when examining how nurse leaders react to different factors leading to burnout. In employing a gender lens framework, future researchers might study how the pressures that working men and women nurse leaders face were intensified during the COVID-19 pandemic. To support nurse leaders in executing their roles, there is a need to widen the scope of conversations about including family-friendly policies and attention to the needs of men and women as nurse leaders. These policies might include but are not limited to paid childcare, flexible time off, access to paid time off and mandatory overtime laws.

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalCOVID-19AdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLeadershipMaleMiddle AgedNurse AdministratorsPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Sex FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesWork-Life BalanceAdministrationBurnoutBurnout, ProfessionalCOVID-19Cross-Sectional Studies

Identifiers

PMID39566937
PMCPMC11580247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.