Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39566552›Full record

ArticleNature2025

The Human Cell Atlas from a cell census to a unified foundation model.

Jennifer E Rood, Samantha Wynne, Lucia Robson, Anna Hupalowska, John Randell, Sarah A Teichmann, Aviv Regev

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 87 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. B-Cell Aware Analysis of Single-Cell Transcriptomics Data.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jennifer E RoodHuman Cell Atlas, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Samantha WynneHuman Cell Atlas, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Lucia RobsonHuman Cell Atlas, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Anna HupalowskaHuman Cell Atlas, Cambridge, MA, USA.
John RandellHuman Cell Atlas, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Sarah A TeichmannHuman Cell Atlas, Cambridge, MA, USA. sat1003@cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-6294-6366
Aviv RegevHuman Cell Atlas, Cambridge, MA, USA. aviv.regev.sc@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3293-3158

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the convergence of notable advances in molecular and spatial profiling methods and new computational approaches taking advantage of artificial intelligence and machine learning, the construction of cell atlases is progressing from data collection to atlas integration and beyond. Here, we explore five ways in which cell atlases, including the Human Cell Atlas, are already revealing valuable biological insights, and how they are poised to provide even greater benefits in the coming years. In particular, we discuss cell atlases as censuses of cells; as 3D maps of cells in the body, across modalities and scales; as maps connecting genotype causes to phenotype effects; as 4D maps of development; and, ultimately, as foundation models of biology unifying all of these aspects and helping to transform medicine.

Indexed as

Atlases as TopicCellsModels, BiologicalAnimalsHumansMachine LearningPhenotype

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.