ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2024
An analysis of intersectional disparities in alcohol consumption in the US.
Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Applying an intersectional lens to alcohol inequities: A conceptual framework.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2025Article
- 'Everyone's a bit buzzed, why not share that': exploring alcohol-related user-generated content among young people in Victoria, Australia.Health promotion international · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Alcohol is one of the leading causes of preventable deaths in the United States (US). Prior research has demonstrated that alcohol consumption and related mortality are socially patterned; however, no study has investigated intersectional disparities in alcohol consumption, i.e., attending to how social positions overlap and interact. In this study, we used an innovative intersectional approach (Multilevel Analysis of Individual Heterogeneity and Discriminatory Accuracy, MAIHDA) and data from a large nationally representative survey (the National Health Interview Survey, 2000-2018) to quantify inter-categorical disparities in alcohol consumption in the US (proportion of current drinkers, and average consumption amongst drinkers), along dimensions of sex, race and ethnicity, age, and level of education. Our analysis revealed significant intersectional disparities in both the prevalence of drinking and the average consumption by drinkers. Young, highly educated White men were the most likely to be current drinkers and consumed the highest amounts of alcohol on average, whilst racially and ethnically minoritized women with lower education were the least likely to drink and had the lowest levels of alcohol consumption, across all age categories. Notably, we found significant interaction effects for many intersectional strata, with much higher consumption estimated for some groups than traditional additive approaches would suggest. By identifying specific understudied groups with high consumption, such as young American Indian or Alaska Native (AI/AN) men, adult Black men with low education, and older White women with high education, this analysis has important implications for future research, policy, and praxis. This is the first known application of MAIHDA to account for a skewed outcome, highlighting and addressing critical methodological considerations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.