ArticleJournal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology2024
Nucleic acid amplification testing using dried blood spots to confirm the diagnosis of HIV-1 in adults.
Article in Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe WHO HIV testing algorithm for high prevalence populations recommends the use of three different serologic assays, though this approach may lead to diagnostic misclassification. The study objective was to compare dried blood spot (DBS)-based HIV-1 nucleic acid detection methods to determine their suitability to confirm the diagnosis of HIV-1 in adults generally with suppressed or low-level plasma HIV-1 RNA.
methodsFour methods were evaluated: Cepheid Xpert HIV-1 Qual Assay (Xpert), Hologic Aptima HIV-1 Quant Dx assay (Aptima), Roche Cobas Ampliprep/Cobas TaqMan HIV-1 test, v.2.0 (CAP/CTM) with guanidinium-based sample pre-extraction buffer (SPEX), or CAP/CTM with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Testing was performed on 163 DBS samples collected from participants with HIV-1 in the AIDS Clinical Trial Group (ACTG) A5230 study (73 samples) and the Peninsula AIDS Research Cohort (PARC) study (90 samples).
resultsXpert and SPEX CAP/CTM [96.9 % (158/163):95.7 % (156/163); P = 0.75) showed similar sensitivity. However, PBS CAP/CTM and Aptima demonstrated significantly lower sensitivity, 68.2 % (107/157) and 69.2 % (99/143), respectively, compared to Xpert and SPEX CAP/CTM (P < 0.0001 for all comparisons). Overall agreement between Xpert and SPEX CAP/CTM was 93.9 % (153/163), including 152 DBS samples in which both methods detected HIV-1 nucleic acids.
conclusionsXpert and SPEX CAP/CTM provide sensitive performance for the detection of HIV-1 nucleic acids using DBS collected from adults living with HIV-1, including those with suppressed virus loads. Given the cost and side-effects associated with inappropriate life-long antiretroviral therapy, these assays may play a role in diagnosing HIV-1 infection in individuals with suspected false-positive serologic testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.