Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39566072›Full record

ArticleFamily practice2025

The presentation and treatment of Dupuytren's disease in Dutch general practitioner care.

Roel J M van Straalen, Dieuwke C Broekstra, Paul M N Werker, Michiel R de Boer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Family practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Roel J M van StraalenDepartment of Plastic Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, HPC BB81, P.O. box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2042-3815
Dieuwke C BroekstraDepartment of Plastic Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, HPC BB81, P.O. box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9240-0199
Paul M N WerkerDepartment of Plastic Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, HPC BB81, P.O. box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1053-0200
Michiel R de BoerDepartment of Primary- and Long-term Care, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, P.O.-box 196, 9700 AD Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7134-7007

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhen research and management of Dupuytren's disease (DD) shift from symptom relief to preventing contractures, general practitioner (GP) care may become more central to treatment. However, the presentation and course of DD in GP care are underexplored and this has been recognized as a knowledge gap that hinders effective treatment decisions. This study is the first to map the trajectory of DD patients in GP care.

methodsUsing electronic health records from Dutch general practices in a regional research network, we conducted a registration-based cohort study in a dynamic population. Descriptive statistics detailed patient demographics, number of contacts, and symptoms per contact. The time and number of contacts before diagnosis were also analysed. Sankey diagrams illustrated the relationship between management options and symptoms.

resultsOver a 16-year period, 84% of patients with a DD diagnosis had visited their GP for this reason, with 73% only having one GP contact. The diagnosis was made at first contact for 93% of patients. Initial contacts often reported a lump (57.3%), but this symptom was less frequent in subsequent visits. 'Daily life impairment' increased after the first contact. The most common management options were referral to secondary care (37.7%) and watchful waiting (35.1%).

conclusionThe diagnosis and management of DD in GP care are in line with the current guidelines. Less than half of the DD patients were referred to secondary care during follow-up. This may give room for preventive treatment that limits progression. Future studies should focus on the accuracy of diagnosis and the feasibility of effective treatments in GP care.

Indexed as

Dupuytren ContractureGeneral PracticeAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesElectronic Health RecordsFemaleGeneral PractitionersHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsReferral and ConsultationSecondary Health CareDupuytren’s contractureepidemiologyprimary caresymptomstreatment

Identifiers

PMID39566072
PMCPMC11811527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.