Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39566058›Full record

SynthesisJournal of medical Internet research2024

The Impact of Patient Access to Electronic Health Records on Health Care Engagement: Systematic Review.

Dalia Alomar, Maryam Almashmoum, Iliada Eleftheriou, Pauline Whelan, John Ainsworth

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of medical Internet research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Digital Dialogs on Rhesus Incompatibility: A Thematic Analysis of Web-Based Parental Narratives.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dalia AlomarDivision of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science System, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0008-2140-3956
Maryam AlmashmoumNuclear Medicine Department, Faisal Sultan Bin Eissa, Kuwait Cancer Control Center, Kuwait City, Kuwait.ORCID 0000-0003-2756-3842
Iliada EleftheriouDivision of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science System, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8474-4303
Pauline WhelanDivision of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science System, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8689-3919
John AinsworthDivision of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science System, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2187-9195

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Manchester Biomedical Research Centre
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth information technologies, including electronic health records (EHRs), have revolutionized health care delivery. These technologies promise to enhance the efficiency and quality of care through improved patient health information management. Despite the transformative potential of EHRs, the extent to which patient access contributes to increased engagement with health care services within different clinical setting remains a distinct and underexplored facet.

objectiveThis systematic review aims to investigate the impact of patient access to EHRs on health care engagement. Specifically, we seek to determine whether providing patients with access to their EHRs contributes to improved engagement with health care services.

methodsA comprehensive systematic review search was conducted across various international databases, including Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and CINAHL, to identify relevant studies published from January 1, 2010, to November 15, 2023. The search on these databases was conducted using a combination of keywords and Medical Subject Heading terms related to patient access to electronic health records, patient engagement, and health care services. Studies were included if they assessed the impact of patient access to EHRs on health care engagement and provided evidence (quantitative or qualitative) for that. The guidelines of the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 statement were followed for study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment. The included studies were assessed for quality using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, and the results were reported using a narrative synthesis.

resultsThe initial search from the databases yielded 1737 studies, to which, after scanning their reference lists, we added 10 studies. Of these 1747 studies, 18 (1.03%) met the inclusion criteria for the final review. The synthesized evidence from these studies revealed a positive relationship between patient access to EHRs and health care engagement, addressing 6 categories of health care engagement dimensions and outcomes, including treatment adherence and self-management, patient involvement and empowerment, health care communication and relationship, patient satisfaction and health outcomes, use of health care resources, and usability concerns and barriers.

conclusionsThe findings suggested a positive association between patient access to EHRs and health care engagement. The implications of these findings for health care providers, policy makers, and patients should be considered, highlighting the potential benefits and challenges associated with implementing and promoting patient access to EHRs. Further research directions have been proposed to deepen our understanding of this dynamic relationship.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsDelivery of Health CareHumansPatient Access to RecordsPatient Participationelectronic health recordsempowermenthealth care engagementhealth care servicespatient experiencepatient satisfactionpersonal health recordsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39566058
PMCPMC11618012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.