ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2024
Digital Image Processing to Detect Adaptive Evolution.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- The persistence and loss of hard selective sweeps amid admixture in ancient Eurasians.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Detecting Positive Selection by Modeling Structure Within Images of Genetic Variation.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- EGGS: Empirical Genotype Generalizer for Samples.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- Selection scans and downstream analysis with selscan.Human population genetics and genomics · 2026Article
- EGGS: Empirical Genotype Generalizer for Samples.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- The persistence and loss of hard selective sweeps amid ancient human admixture.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Selection scans and downstream analysis with selscan.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Interpreting Supervised Machine Learning Inferences in Population Genomics Using Haplotype Matrix Permutations.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In recent years, advances in image processing and machine learning have fueled a paradigm shift in detecting genomic regions under natural selection. Early machine learning techniques employed population-genetic summary statistics as features, which focus on specific genomic patterns expected by adaptive and neutral processes. Though such engineered features are important when training data are limited, the ease at which simulated data can now be generated has led to the recent development of approaches that take in image representations of haplotype alignments and automatically extract important features using convolutional neural networks. Digital image processing methods termed α-molecules are a class of techniques for multiscale representation of objects that can extract a diverse set of features from images. One such α-molecule method, termed wavelet decomposition, lends greater control over high-frequency components of images. Another α-molecule method, termed curvelet decomposition, is an extension of the wavelet concept that considers events occurring along curves within images. We show that application of these α-molecule techniques to extract features from image representations of haplotype alignments yield high true positive rate and accuracy to detect hard and soft selective sweep signatures from genomic data with both linear and nonlinear machine learning classifiers. Moreover, we find that such models are easy to visualize and interpret, with performance rivaling those of contemporary deep learning approaches for detecting sweeps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.